Cited by 25Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchNail Diseases and Treatments

Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A before and after Study on the Impact of Oral Fluconazole Therapy

Nguyen, Yvonne, Lee, Andrew, Fischer, Gayle·2017·Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Chronic vulvovaginal candidiasis (CVVC) is a disorder characterised by the signs and symptoms of vulvovaginal inflammation and causally associated with the presence of Candida spp. in the vagina. This study aimed to establish the impact of treatment with fluconazole in CVVC on patients' quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a before and after study conducted in vulval dermatology clinics in Sydney, Australia. Patients were assessed at baseline by the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) grading of erythema at baseline and at 12 weeks after an oral fluconazole regime. The primary outcome measures were a change in their DLQI score and VAS grading. The secondary outcome measures were its tolerability and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 82 of 91 patients (90%) completed the study. The mean drop in their DLQI score was 11.6 [95% CI (10.1, 13.0)] (P < 0.001). The post-treatment VAS scores were significantly lower than the pretreatment scores (P < 0.001). Adverse effects requiring cessation of fluconazole occurred in 4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole treatment at a dose of 50-100 mg daily achieved a significant observable and improvement in the QoL of 96% of patients with CVVC within 12 weeks of treatment. Adverse effects were minimal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajd.12487

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, Y., Lee, A., & Fischer, G.
Affiliations
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Yvonne
Venue
Australasian Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-11
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
e176-e181
ISSN
  • 0004-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-0960
OpenAlex
W2381982818
Cited by
25
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
quality of life, oral fluconazole, antifungal therapy, Dermatology Life Quality Index, vulvar erythema, treatment tolerability, adverse events, Candida
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Fluconazole, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review