Cited by 21Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPregnancy and Medication Impact

The first International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups summit on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in early pregnancy: TOBOGM Summit Report

Open access
Sweeting, Arianne, MacMillan, Freya, Simmons, David, for the TOBOGM Summit attendees·2024·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

The first International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Summit on the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in early pregnancy (Treatment of Booking Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) Summit) was held on the 17 November 2022 in Sydney, Australia. It sought to use the TOBOGM trial findings to scope the issues involved with early screening, to inform future discussions over possible approaches for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in early pregnancy. Most delegates supported testing for early GDM using a one‐step 75 g oral glucose tolerance test approach with Canadian Diabetes Association criteria preferred, but highlighted the importance of considering resources, cost, consumer perspectives and equity in translating TOBOGM results into a clinical approach to screening for, and diagnosing, early GDM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajo.13823

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) Consensus Panel. IADPSG recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33(3): 676– 682. 20190296 PMC2827530
  2. [3]Sweeting A, Wong J, Murphy HR, Ross GP. A clinical update on gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev 2022; 43(5): 763– 793. 35041752 PMC9512153
  3. [4]Immanuel J, Simmons D. Screening and treatment for early‐onset gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Curr Diab Rep 2017; 17(11): 115. 28971305
  4. [5]Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S et al. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222(5): 495.e1– 495.e8. PMC7196002 31926951
  5. [7]Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358(19): 1991– 2002. 18463375
  6. [8]Hod M, Kapur A, Sacks DA et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on gestational diabetes mellitus: A pragmatic guide for diagnosis, management, and care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 131(Suppl 3): S173– S211. 29644654
  7. [11]Benhalima K, Mathieu C, Damm P et al. A proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes in Europe: an opinion paper by the European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG). Diabetologia 2015; 58(7): 1422– 1429. 25952480
  8. [13]McIntyre HD, Sacks DA, Barbour LA et al. Issues with the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in early pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2016; 39(1): 53– 54. 26519336
  9. [14]Vandorsten JP, Dodson WC, Espeland MA et al. NIH consensus development conference: diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2013; 29(1): 1– 31. 23748438
  10. [15]American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Practice bulletin No. 137: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Committee on practice bulletins–obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(2 Pt 1): 406– 416. 23969827
  11. [16]Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2013; 37: Supp 1: S1‐3. 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.009. 24070926 · DOI
  12. [17]Saeedi M, Cao Y, Fadl H et al. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus when implementing the IADPSG criteria: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 172: 108642. 33359574

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sweeting, A., MacMillan, F., Simmons, D., & attendees, F. T. T. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals (AU)
Corresponding author
Sweeting, Arianne
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-18
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
519-523
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
OpenAlex
W4394920460
Cited by
21
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, early pregnancy, early screening, 75 g oral glucose tolerance test, cost, customer perspective, health equity
MeSH terms
Australia, Congresses as Topic, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Pregnancy, Societies, Medical, Diabetes, Gestational, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review