The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frailty and Early Hospital Readmission After Kidney Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
Early hospital readmission (EHR) after kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with increased morbidity and higher costs. Registry-based recipient, transplant and center-level predictors of EHR are limited, and novel predictors are needed. We hypothesized that frailty, a measure of physiologic reserve initially described and validated in geriatrics and recently associated with early KT outcomes, might serve as a novel, independent predictor of EHR in KT recipients of all ages. We measured frailty in 383 KT recipients at Johns Hopkins Hospital. EHR was ascertained from medical records as ≥1 hospitalization within 30 days of initial post-KT discharge. Frail KT recipients were much more likely to experience EHR (45.8% vs. 28.0%, p = 0.005), regardless of age. After adjusting for previously described registry-based risk factors, frailty independently predicted 61% higher risk of EHR (adjusted RR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.18-2.19, p = 0.002). In addition, frailty improved EHR risk prediction by improving the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (p = 0.01) as well as the net reclassification index (p = 0.04). Identifying frail KT recipients for targeted outpatient monitoring and intervention may reduce EHR rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W. J., Burke, G., et al. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 · Cited by 24,907
Self-citationWalston, J. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.20.2333 · Cited by 940
Self-citationInflammation and frailty in older women
Leng, S. X., Xue, Q., Tian, J., Walston, J. D., & Fried, L. P. (2007) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01186.x · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Cited by
Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States
Bandeen-Roche, K., Seplaki, C. L., Huang, J., Buta, B., Kalyani, R. R., Varadhan, R., Xue, Q.-L., Walston, J. D., & Kasper, J. D. (2015) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glv133 · Cited by 800
Self-citationFrailty phenotypes and mortality after lung transplantation: a prospective cohort study
Singer, J. P., Diamond, J. M., Anderson, M. R., Katz, P. P., Covinsky, K., Oyster, M., Blue, T., Soong, A., Kalman, L., Shrestha, P., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ajt.14873 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- McAdams-DeMarco, M. A., Law, A., Salter, M. L., Chow, E., Grams, M., Walston, J., & Segev, D. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2091-2095
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1493836040
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.