Cited by 31Asthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationOccupational exposure and asthma

Inhibition of endotoxin‐induced perinatal asthma protection by pollutants in an experimental mouse model

Reiprich, M., Rudzok, S., Schütze, N., Simon, J. C., Lehmann, I., Trump, S., Polte, T.·2013·Allergy

Abstract

Background One of the most promising strategies to face the increasing asthma prevalence and to prevent disease development might be an early contact with microbial compounds. However, little is known about an interaction between an early-life contact to microbial compounds leading to asthma protection in the offspring and a co-exposure to allergy-promoting pollutants. Methods Pregnant BALB/c mice were repeatedly exposed to aerosolized endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS). The offspring was further exposed to aerosolized LPS before allergen sensitization with ovalbumin (OVA). Some of the mice were co-exposed to mycotoxins or diesel exhaust particles (DEP) during pregnancy. The 6-week-old offspring was immunized with OVA and analyzed in a murine asthma model. Results While the offspring of naïve mothers developed an asthma-like phenotype, the offspring of mice perinatally exposed to LPS was significantly protected. Co-exposure of mice to mycotoxins or DEP during pregnancy inhibited the LPS-induced protection leading to the development of eosinophilic airway inflammation, airway hyperactivity, and increased antigen-specific IgE levels in the offspring. Furthermore, the asthma-preventive effect of perinatal LPS exposure was IFN-gamma dependent. Additionally, the IFN-gamma promoter of CD4+ T cells in the LPS-exposed offspring revealed a significant protection against loss of histone 4 acetylation, which was abolished after prenatal co-exposure to pollutants. Prenatal treatment of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/all.12121

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiprich, M., Rudzok, S., Schütze, N., Simon, J. C., Lehmann, I., Trump, S., & Polte, T.
Affiliations
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Corresponding author
Polte, T.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-15
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
481-489
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W1973460381
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide, prenatal exposure, mycotoxins, diesel exhaust particles, air pollution, ovalbumin sensitization, allergic asthma, eosinophilic airway inflammation, IgE, interferon-gamma, CD4+ T cells, N-acetylcysteine, antioxidants, maternal exposure
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Acetylcysteine, Air Pollutants, Allergens, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antioxidants, Asthma, Disease Models, Animal, Endotoxins, Female, Histones, Interferon-gamma, Lipopolysaccharides, Mycotoxins, Ovalbumin, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Maternal Exposure, Antibodies, Blocking, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review