Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Europe: a systematic review

Open access
Panesar, S. S., Javad, S., de Silva, D., Nwaru, B. I., Hickstein, L., Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Worm, M., Bilò, M. B., Cardona, V., Dubois, A. E. J., Dunn Galvin, A., Eigenmann, P., Fernandez-Rivas, M., Halken, S., Lack, G., Niggemann, B., Santos, A. F., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., Zolkipli, Z. Q., Sheikh, A., the EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Group·2013·Allergy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an acute, potentially fatal, multi-organ system, allergic reaction caused by the release of chemical mediators from mast cells and basophils. Uncertainty exists around epidemiological measures of incidence and prevalence, risk factors, risk of recurrence, and death due to anaphylaxis. This systematic review aimed to (1) understand and describe the epidemiology of anaphylaxis and (2) describe how these characteristics vary by person, place, and time. METHODS: Using a highly sensitive search strategy, we identified systematic reviews of epidemiological studies, descriptive and analytical epidemiological investigations, and studies involving analysis of routine data. RESULTS: Our searches identified a total of 5,843 potentially eligible studies, of which 49 satisfied our inclusion criteria. Of these, three were suitable for pooled estimates of prevalence. The incidence rates for all-cause anaphylaxis ranged from 1.5 to 7.9 per 100,000 person-years. These data indicated that an estimated 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.5) of the population experience anaphylaxis at some point in their lives. Food, drugs, stinging insects, and latex were the most commonly identified triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis is a common problem, affecting an estimated 1 in 300 of the European population at some time in their lives. Future research needs to focus on better understanding of the trends across Europe and identifying those most likely to experience fatal reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/all.12272

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Panesar, S. S., Javad, S., de Silva, D., Nwaru, B. I., Hickstein, L., Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Worm, M., Bilò, M. B., Cardona, V., Dubois, A. E. J., Dunn Galvin, A., Eigenmann, P., Fernandez-Rivas, M., Halken, S., Lack, G., Niggemann, B., Santos, A. F., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., Zolkipli, Z. Q., Sheikh, A., & the EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Group
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10-14
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
1353-1361
ISSN
0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064675002
Cited by
417
References
53
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Europe: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/all.12272
The paper
Panesar, S. S., Javad, S., de Silva, D., Nwaru, B. I., Hickstein, L., Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Worm, M., Bilò, M. B., Cardona, V., Dubois, A. E. J., Dunn Galvin, A., Eigenmann, P., Fernandez-Rivas, M., Halken, S., Lack, G., Niggemann, B., Santos, A. F., Vlieg-Boerstra, B. J., . . . the EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Group. (2013). The epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Europe: a systematic review. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12272

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.