Cited by 7Migration and Exile StudiesLatin American and Latino StudiesMigration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bearing Witness on the US–Mexico Border

McGuire, Randall H.·2018·American Anthropologist

Abstract

Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aman.13076

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McGuire, R. H.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Randall H.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
120
Issue
3
Pages
541-542
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W2888491131
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Latin American and Latino Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Migration, Health, Geopolitics, Historical Geography
Keywords
U.S.-Mexico border, borderlands, witnessing, border crossing, migration, anthropology of borders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review