CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Migration and Exile StudiesHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesCultural Heritage Management and Preservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Materiality and Heritage of Contemporary Forced Migration

McGuire, Randall H.·2020·Annual Review of Anthropology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074624
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fleeing violence, poverty, abuse, war, and climatic change, tens of millions of people have fled their homes in the Global South seeking refuge in adjacent nations and in the Global North. This modern migration entails a material, sensual experience in time. The craft of archaeology has traditionally engaged with the material, the sensual, and the temporal. Archaeologists who study the materiality of modern undocumented migration embrace activist-engaged research that applies the craft of archaeology to the contemporary world. They study the materiality of migration to reveal and comprehend the lived experience of displaced persons. They seek to understand the barriers erected to that journey, the things migrants acquire and leave on the trail, migrant placemaking, their stranded lives, how they build new lives, what the migrants have left behind in their home countries, and the heritage of forced migration. They approach this work in critical solidarity with displaced peoples.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074624

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Anthony DW., 1997, Migration and Invasion in Archaeological Explanation, 21
  2. Atalay S, 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Prospects and Practices
  3. Augé M., 1995, Non-Places: An Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity, transl. J Howe
  4. 10.5744/florida/9780813060804.001.0001 · DOI
  5. Breene ML. 2018. Reframing the Lampedusa cross: the British Museum's display of the Mediterranean migrant crisis. See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 167–75
  6. Byrne D. 2018. What anchors theTu Do? See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 176–83
  7. Caraher W., 2015, Archaeol. Mediterr. World
  8. Caraher W., 2017, Archaeol. Mediterr. World
  9. Caraher W, 2016, Archaeol. Mediterr. World
  10. CfAS (Coalit. Archaeol. Synth.)., 2019, Coalition for Archaeological Synthesis
  11. Coelho RG. 2018. The garden of refugees. See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 156–66
  12. Colomer L., 2013, Eur. Archaeol., 39, 16
  13. Cotter H., 2017, New York Times
  14. Crow CH., 2013, The material culture of migrant life at the U.S./México border.
  15. De León J., 2012, Forum. Krit. Archäol., 1, 141
  16. De León J. 2019. “Como me Duele”: undocumented Central American bodies in motion. See Sheridan & McGuire 2019, pp. 99–123
  17. Díaz-Barriga M, 2020, Fencing in Democracy Necrocitizenship and the US-Mexico Border Wall
  18. Fernandez VM., 2006, Una Arqueologia Crítica: Ciencia, Ética y Politica en la Construcción del Pasado
  19. Gould RA, 1981, Modern Material Culture Studies: The Archaeology of Us
  20. Grabowska S., 2016, Footprint, 10, 115
  21. Hakenbeck S., 2008, Archaeol. Rev. Camb., 23, 9
  22. Hamilakis Y., 2016, The Nation
  23. Han S, 2019, Open Anthropol, 7
  24. Harrison R, Appelgren S, Bohlin A. 2018. Commentary: Belonging and belongings: on migrant and nomadic heritages in and for the Anthropocene. See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 209–20
  25. Int. Rescue Comm., 2015, Medium, Uprooted
  26. Kirtsoglou E. 2018. Commentary: Nomadic ethics. See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 221–30
  27. Lee L., 2019, Situational identity: the materiality of migration, April 10
  28. McAtackney L, 2020, Walling In, Walling Out: Why Are We Building New Barriers to Divide Us?
  29. McGuire RH., 1992, A Marxist Archaeology
  30. McGuire RH, Van Dyke RM. 2019. CrossinglaLínea: bodily encounters with the U.S.–México border in Ambos Nogales. See Sheridan & McGuire 2019, pp. 41–70
  31. Migr. Data Portal., 2019, Immigration and Emigration Statistics
  32. Migr. Data Portal., 2019, Regional Data Overview
  33. Ortega B., 2018, CNN
  34. Riggs EP., 2020, An archaeology of refugee resettlement: Delhi after Partition
  35. Sheridan TE, 2019, The Border and Its Bodies: The Embodiment of Risk Along the U.S.-México Line.
  36. Undocumented Migrant Project., 2019, Undocumented Migration Project
  37. Vallet E., 2014, Borders, Fences and Walls: State of Insecurity?
  38. VanValkenburgh P. 2018. Commentary: Whither the history of forced and undocumented migration? Notes for genealogical and comparative approaches. See Hamilakis 2018, pp. 231–38
  39. Wyman M., 1998, DPs: Europe's Displaced Persons, 1945–1951

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
McGuire, R. H.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Randall H.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
175-191
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
DOI
10.1146/annurev-anthro-010220-074624
OpenAlex
W3041092656
Semantic Scholar
2739f8f4116a4eeef265e3f77f25c59b3e8fb38a
Cited by
25
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Keywords
forced migration, contemporary archaeology, irregular migration, temporality of migration, critical solidarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review