The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Intravenous lidocaine is used widely for its effect on postoperative pain and recovery but it can be, and has been, fatal when used inappropriately and incorrectly. The risk‐benefit ratio of i.v. lidocaine varies with type of surgery and with patient factors such as comorbidity (including pre‐existing chronic pain). This consensus statement aims to address three questions. First, does i.v. lidocaine effectively reduce postoperative pain and facilitate recovery? Second, is i.v. lidocaine safe? Third, does the fact that i.v. lidocaine is not licensed for this indication affect its use? We suggest that i.v. lidocaine should be regarded as a ‘high‐risk’ medicine. Individual anaesthetists may feel that, in selected patients, i.v. lidocaine may be beneficial as part of a multimodal peri‐operative pain management strategy. This approach should be approved by hospital medication governance systems, and the individual clinical decision should be made with properly informed consent from the patient concerned. If i.v. lidocaine is used, we recommend an initial dose of no more than 1.5 mg.kg ‐1 , calculated using the patient’s ideal body weight and given as an infusion over 10 min. Thereafter, an infusion of no more than 1.5 mg.kg ‐1 .h ‐1 for no longer than 24 h is recommended, subject to review and re‐assessment. Intravenous lidocaine should not be used at the same time as, or within the period of action of, other local anaesthetic interventions. This includes not starting i.v. lidocaine within 4 h after any nerve block, and not performing any nerve block until 4 h after discontinuing an i.v. lidocaine infusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
(1911) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1911.04260070032017 · Cited by 3,361
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial
Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., & Ambroz, A. (1981) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(81)90056-8 · Cited by 1,349
What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain?
Cepeda, S. M., Africano, J. M., Polo, R., Alcala, R., & Carr, D. B. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00176-3 · Cited by 519
Lidocaine Pharmacokinetics in Advanced Heart Failure, Liver Disease, and Renal Failure in Humans
THOMSON, P. D., MELMON, K. L., RICHARDSON, J. A., COHN, K., STEINBRUNN, W., CUDIHEE, R., & ROWLAND, M. (1973) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-78-4-499 · Cited by 512
Lie, K. I., Wellens, H. J., van Capelle, F. J., & Durrer, D. (1974) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197412192912504 · Cited by 441
Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion Facilitates Acute Rehabilitation after Laparoscopic Colectomy
Kaba, A., Laurent, S. R., Detroz, B. J., Sessler, D. I., Durieux, M. E., Lamy, M. L., & Joris, J. L. (2007) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200701000-00007 · Cited by 432
Gabapentin and postoperative pain – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Ho, K.-Y., Gan, T. J., & Habib, A. S. (2006) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2006.06.018 · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Foo, I., Macfarlane, A. J. R., Srivastava, D., Bhaskar, A., Barker, H., Knaggs, R., Eipe, N., & Smith, A. F.
- Venue
- Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-11-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2044
- OpenAlex
- W3096187702
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 24.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anae.15270
- The paper
- Foo, I., Macfarlane, A. J. R., Srivastava, D., Bhaskar, A., Barker, H., Knaggs, R., Eipe, N., & Smith, A. F. (2021). The use of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative pain and recovery: international consensus statement on efficacy and safety. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.