Cited by 40Environmental Impact and SustainabilityAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsBiomedical and Chemical Research

Comparing the environmental impact of inhalational anaesthesia and propofol‐based intravenous anaesthesia

Allen, C., Baxter, I.·2021·Anaesthesia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anae.15356

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, C., & Baxter, I.
Affiliations
Freeman Hospital (GB)
Venue
Anaesthesia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
862-863
ISSN
  • 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2044
OpenAlex
W3114086190
Cited by
40
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
environmental impact, inhalational anesthesia, propofol, intravenous anesthesia, inhalational anesthetics, carbon footprint
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, Inhalation, Anesthesia, Intravenous, Environment, Humans, Propofol, Anesthetics, Inhalation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review