Cited by 44Sperm and Testicular FunctionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Determination of seminal oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) as an easy and cost-effective clinical marker of male infertility

Open access
Agarwal, A., Henkel, R., Sharma, R., Tadros, N. N., Sabanegh, E.·2018·Andrologia

Abstract

Oxidative stress (OS) is an important contributing factor to male infertility. While previous methods to measure seminal OS are time-consuming and limited to the use of freshly produced semen, oxidation reduction potential (ORP) is easier and quicker to perform and can also be used in frozen semen. Therefore, this study evaluated the clinical utility of ORP as a potential marker of male infertility. ORP was measured in semen samples from 293 patients and 15 fertile controls and categorised according to WHO criteria as normozoospermic, oligozoospermic, asthenozoospermic, teratozoospermic and oligoasthenoteratozoospermic. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to differentiate these categories. Semen parameters were significantly different when subjects were grouped as control and patients or between the patient and normozoospermic group for concentration and morphology. ORP levels were significantly different between the control and normozoospermic group. When subjects were grouped based on concentration, motility, morphology or a combination of these, the area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and cut-off values were significantly different. These differences were significant when combined with ORP and grouped with any two sperm abnormalities. In conclusion, ORP is a quick, easy, cost-effective and reliable marker of semen quality as well as oxidative stress for use in a clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/and.12914

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Agarwal, A., Ahmad, G., & Sharma, R. (2015). Reference values of reactive oxygen species in seminal ejaculates using chemiluminescence assay. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32, 1721-1729.
  2. Agarwal, A., Gupta, S., & Sharma, R. (2016). Oxidation-Reduction potential measurement in ejaculated semen samples. In Agarwal A., Gupta S., Sharma R. (eds) Andrological evaluation of male infertility: A laboratory guide, Vol. 22 (pp. 165-170). Switzerland: Springer Nature, Springer International Publishing, AG.
  3. Agarwal, A., & Wang, S. M. (2017). Clinical relevance of oxidation-reduction potential in the evaluation of male infertility. Urology, 2017(104), 84-89.
  4. Agarwal, A., Zini, A., & Sigman, M. (2013). Is sperm DNA integrity assess- ment useful? Journal of Urology, 190, 1645-1647.
  5. Cavallini, G. (2006). Male idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Asian Journal of Andrology, 8, 143-157.
  6. Esteves, S. C. (2010). Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and con- troversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 40, 443-453.
  7. Esteves, S. C., & Agarwal, A. (2011). Novel concepts in male infertility. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 37, 5-15.
  8. Guzick, D. S., Overstreet, J. W., Factor-Litvak, P., Brazil, C. K., Nakajima, S. T., Coutifaris, C., … Network National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine. (2001). Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men. New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1388-1393.
  9. Roychoudhury, S., Sharma, R., Sikka, S., & Agarwal, A. (2016). Diagnostic application of total antioxidant capacity in seminal plasma to assess ox- idative stress in male factor infertility. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33, 627-635.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agarwal, A., Henkel, R., Sharma, R., Tadros, N. N., & Sabanegh, E.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of the Western Cape (ZA)
  • SIU Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Agarwal, A.
Venue
Andrologia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-23
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
e12914
ISSN
0303-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766537744
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Center for Reproductive Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
redox potential, seminal plasma, male infertility, oxidative stress, semen quality, sperm abnormalities, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, frozen semen, clinical biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Oxidation-Reduction, Semen, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Oxidative Stress, Semen Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review