Cited by 82Sperm and Testicular FunctionHormonal and reproductive studiesMale Reproductive Health Studies

Reproductive function in male patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Open access
La Vignera, S., Condorelli, R. A., Di Mauro, M., Lo Presti, D., Mongioì, L. M., Russo, G., Calogero, A. E.·2015·Andrology

Abstract

Summary: This study was undertaken to evaluate conventional and some of the main bio‐functional spermatozoa parameters, serum gonadal hormones and didymo‐epididymal ultrasound features in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). DM1 affects an increasing number of men of reproductive age. Diabetes may affect male reproduction by acting on the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis, causing sexual dysfunction or disrupting male accessory gland function. However, data on spermatozoa parameters and other aspects of the reproductive function in these patients are scanty. Thirty‐two patients with DM 1 [27.0 (25.0–30.0 years)] and 20 age‐matched fertile healthy men [28.0 (27.25–30.75 years)] were enrolled. Patients with diabetic neuropathy, other endocrine disorders or conditions known to alter spermatozoa parameters were excluded. Each subject underwent semen analysis, blood withdrawal for fasting and post‐prandial glycaemia, hormonal analysis and didymo‐epididymal ultrasound evaluation before and after ejaculation. Patients with DM 1 had a lower percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility [10.0 (7.0–12.75) vs. 45.0 (42.0–47.75) %; p < 0.01] and a higher percentage of spermatozoa with abnormal mitochondrial function than controls [47.0 (43.0–55.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0–5.0) %; p < 0.01]. Patients also had greater post‐ejaculatory diameters of cephalic [11.5 (10.2–13.6) vs. 6.0 (4.0–7.0) mm; p < 0.01] and caudal epididymis [5.5 (4.00–7.55) vs. 3.0 (2.0–4.0) mm; p < 0.01] compared to controls, suggesting a lack of the physiological post‐ejaculation epididymal shrinkage. Correlation analysis suggested that progressive motility was associated with fasting glucose (r = −0.68; p < 0.01). The other parameters did not show any significant difference. Patients with DM 1 had a lower percentage of spermatozoa with progressive motility, impaired mitochondrial function and epididymal post‐ejaculatory dysfunction. These findings may explain why patients with DM 1 experience fertility disturbance. Larger multi‐centric studies are necessary to confirm these results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/andr.12097

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence is insufficient to support any particular transitional care model because studies are limited.

    “However, due to limited studies there is insufficient evidence to support a particular transitional care model.1536–1541”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1538]

    The Results and the 'Diabetological interest, originality and limitations of the study' section concern reproductive function in men with type 1 diabetes. Searches for transitional care models and transition of care found no passage assessing those models or the evidence for choosing one; the section's reference to limited studies concerns sperm parameters, not transitional care. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
La Vignera, S., Condorelli, R. A., Di Mauro, M., Lo Presti, D., Mongioì, L. M., Russo, G., & Calogero, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Catania Catania Italy
  • University of Catania (IT)
  • Unit of Pediatrics Teaching Hospital “Policlinico ‐ Vittorio Emanuele” University of Catania Catania Italy
Venue
Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-07
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
1082-1087
ISSN
  • 2047-2919 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2927
OpenAlex
W2181127586
Cited by
82
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
male reproductive function, sperm motility, progressive motility, gonadal hormones, fasting blood glucose, hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis, male infertility, semen quality, sexual dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, DNA Damage, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Mitochondria, Reproduction, Risk Factors, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, Spermatozoa, Biomarkers, Apoptosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review