Cited by 167Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNuclear Receptors and SignalingNeurological disorders and treatments

An updated review of Parkinson's disease genetics and clinicopathological correlations

Open access
Ferreira, M., Massano, J.·2017·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Knowledge regarding the pathophysiological basis of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been greatly expanded over the past two decades, with extraordinary contributions from the field of genetics. However, genetic classifications became complex, difficult to follow, and at times misleading, by placing well-established monogenic forms of the disease along with others associated with risk loci, often ill characterized. The present paper summarizes the genetic, clinical, and neuropathological findings of the currently described monogenic forms of PD and also approaches the progress made in determining genetic risk factors for PD. Furthermore, the text incorporates the data into a recently proposed classification system that will hopefully bring a "user-friendly" approach to this issue. This paper also highlights a number of inconsistencies regarding classification of PD as a single, unique clinicopathological entity-in fact, in order to achieve the development of truly innovative therapies, PD should probably be regarded clinically as a "Parkinson's disease cluster", instead of a single disease. In the future, we hope that an in-depth and groundbreaking understanding of PD will allow the development of truly disease-modifying therapies that will target the molecular processes responsible for the cascade of pathological events underlying each form of PD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ane.12616

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutations in PRKN and PINK1 have been identified in familial and sporadic PD.

    “Mutations in PRKN (which is encoded by PARK2 gene) and PINK1 (which is encoded by PARK6 gene) have also been identified in familial and sporadic PD.266”

    From Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development (2023) · cites this paper as [266]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, M., & Massano, J.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Massano, J.
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-08
Volume
135
Issue
3
Pages
273-284
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2414116245
Cited by
167
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Novartis
  • Centro de Investigação Clínica, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, genetic classification, monogenic Parkinson's disease, genetic susceptibility loci, clinicopathological correlation, neuropathology, disease classification, disease-modifying therapy, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Humans, Parkinson Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review