Cited by 308Race, History, and American SocietyColonialism, slavery, and tradeVisual Culture and Art Theory

The Labor of (Re)reading Plantation Landscapes Fungible(ly): Fungibility

King, Tiffany Lethabo·2016·Antipode

Abstract

This article centers Saidiya Hartman's and Hortense Spillers' theorizations of Black fungibility as well as two speculative visual works in order to read Black bodies on plantation landscapes as symbols of transition, process, genderlessness and boundarylessness. I argue that reading Black bodies in this way breaks with the totalizing visual, conceptual and ontological regime of labor that tends to over determine Blackness within critical theories. Two visual fields help me with this counter read: William Gerrard De Brahm's 1757 “Map of South Carolina and a Part of Georgia”, as well as Julie Dash's 1991 images of the porous indigo-stained hands of former slaves who worked indigo in the film Daughters of the Dust. While these two images oppose one another, their visual conventions enable a break with colonial and humanist scopic regimes like “Black labor” that tend to subsume multiple and intricate processes into the governing logic of labor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anti.12227

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dash, 1991, Daughters of the Dust (film)
  2. Hartman, 1997, Scenes of Subjection: Terror, Slavery, and Self-making in 19th Century America
  3. Wynter, 1994, Race, Discourse, and the Origin of the Americas, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, T. L.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
King, Tiffany Lethabo
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-22
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1022-1039
ISSN
0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2311167398
Cited by
308
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
36.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antipode (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
Keywords
plantation landscapes, Black body, Saidiya Hartman, Hortense Spillers, Black labor, indigo cultivation, Daughters of the Dust, Julie Dash, freedmen, scopic regimes, boundarylessness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review