Cited by 5Child Nutrition and Water AccessPublic Health and NutritionPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

A realistic evaluation approach highlighted the success factors and difficulties of an innovative and comprehensive malnutrition programme in Madagascar

Open access
Magnin, Margot, Jeannot, Emilien, Voahangy, Rajaobelina, Stoll, Beat·2018·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

AIM: Malnutrition has multiple causes, not just a lack of calories. We explored the successes and barriers of an innovative, comprehensive programme in Madagascar that educated mothers in particular about nutrition. METHODS: The outpatient programme in Antananarivo treats 2400 malnourished children from 6 to 59 months each year. The 35-day programme comprises health checks, cooking demonstrations, the distribution of enriched flour supplements and two food-related games that are called Nutricartes and are based on boards and picture cards. In 2014, we involved 74 of the children's mothers in a realistic evaluation process, which investigates the mechanisms that produce a particular outcome in a given context. RESULTS: The mechanisms of success were the community-based aspects of the programme, the kindness and equality displayed by the nutritional assistants and improved household budgeting and hygiene. Children ate better and improved their health, which reduced medical visits and costs. Finally, the mothers became proud of their achievements and told other mothers what they had learnt. Adherence was greatest when the women were on a minimum wage and strongly motivated. CONCLUSION: The effect of this multifaceted programme was that the mothers received sustainable education about healthy eating and improved childhood health and nutrition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.14267

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magnin, M., Jeannot, E., Voahangy, R., & Stoll, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Institute of Global Health Faculty of Medicine University of Geneva Geneva Switzerland
  • Medical Dispensary, Maternity Ward and CRENAM (Outpatient nutritional recovery and education centres which deal with moderate acute cases of malnutrition) of Anosizato and Miray Association Antananarivo Madagascar
Corresponding author
Magnin, Margot
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-06
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
1570-1580
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2789765851
Cited by
5
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dora Foundation, Geneva
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
child malnutrition, maternal nutrition education, realist evaluation, cooking demonstrations, household budgeting, hygiene, minimum wage, Antananarivo, Madagascar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review