Cited by 30Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and health

Rapid review shows that probiotics and fermented infant formulas do not cause d‐lactic acidosis in healthy children

Łukasik, J, Salminen, S, Szajewska, H·2018·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim: Extensive ongoing research on probiotics and infant formulas raises a number of safety questions. One concern is the potential influence of d‐lactic acid‐containing preparations on the health of infants and children. The aim of this review was to summarise the available knowledge on the ingestion of d‐lactic acid‐producing bacteria, acidified infant formulas and fermented infant formulas as a potential cause of paediatric d‐lactic acidosis. Methods: A Medline database search was performed in July 2017, with no restrictions on the language, article type or publication date. The 1715 search results were screened for clinical trials, review articles, case series and case reports of relevance to the topic. Results: We identified five randomised controlled trials from 2005 to 2017 covering 544 healthy infants and some case reports and experimental studies. No clinically relevant adverse effects of d‐lactic acid‐producing probiotics and fermented infant formulas were described in healthy children. However, a harmless, subclinical accumulation of d‐lactate was theoretically possible. The only known cases of paediatric d‐lactic acidosis occurred in patients with short bowel syndrome or, historically, in infants fed with acidified formulas. Conclusion: Our main finding was that probiotics and fermented formulas did not cause d‐lactic acidosis in healthy children.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.14338

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of data in preterm infants led to a caution about using D-lactate-producing probiotics in this population, although a controlled trial in healthy full-term infants showed that D-lactate-producing L. reuteri DSM-17938 did not result in acidosis and probiotic-containing infant formulas were not associated with acidosis.

    “Lack of data in preterm infants led to a caution about using D-lactate-producing probiotics in this population,125 although a controlled trial in healthy full-term infants showed that D-lactate-producing L. reuteri DSM-17938 did not result in acidosis126 and probiotic-containing infant formulas were not associated with acidosis.127”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Łukasik, J., Salminen, S., & Szajewska, H.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Szajewska, H
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-24
Volume
107
Issue
8
Pages
1322-1326
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W2795011776
Cited by
30
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
D-lactic acidosis, probiotics, healthy infants, short bowel syndrome
MeSH terms
Infant Health, Acidosis, Lactic, Child, Preschool, Female, Fermentation, Humans, Infant, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Assessment, Lactic Acid, Probiotics, Infant Formula

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review