Cited by 47Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthInfant Health and Development

A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Safety Trial Evaluating D-Lactic Acid Production in Healthy Infants Fed a Lactobacillus reuteri -containing Formula

Open access
Papagaroufalis, Konstantinos, Fotiou, Aikaterini, Egli, Delphine, Tran, Liên-Anh, Steenhout, Philippe·2014·Nutrition and Metabolic Insights

Abstract

Background: D-Lactic acidosis in infants fed lactic acid bacteria-containing products is a concern. Methods: The primary objective of this non-inferiority trial was to compare urinary D-lactic acid concentrations during the first 28 days of life in infants fed formula containing Lactobacillus reuteri (1.2 x 10 6 colony forming units (CFU)/ml) with those fed a control formula. The non-inferiority margin was set at a two-fold increase in D-lactic acid (0.7 mmol/mol creatinine, log-transformed). Healthy term infants in Greece were enrolled between birth and 72 hours of age, and block randomized to a probiotic ( N = 44) or control ( N = 44) group. They were exclusively fed their formulae until 28 days of age and followed up at 7, 14, 28, 112, and 168 ± 3 days. Anthropometric measurements were taken at each visit and tolerance recorded until 112 days. Urine was collected before study formula intake and at all visits up to 112 days and blood at 14 days. Results: D-Lactic acid concentration in the probiotic group was below the non-inferiority margin at 28 days: treatment effect -0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [-0.48 to 0.41]) mmol/mol creatinine but was above the non-inferiority margin at 7 and 14 days–-treatment effect 0.50 (95% CI: [0.05-0.96]) mmol/mol creatinine and 0.45 (95% CI: [0.00-0.90]) mmol/mol creatinine, respectively. Blood acid excess and pH, anthropometry, tolerance, and adverse events (AEs) were not significantly different between groups. Conclusion: Intake of L. reuteri-containing formula was safe and did not cause an increase in D-lactic acid beyond two weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01119170.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4137/nmi.s14113

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of data in preterm infants led to a caution about using D-lactate-producing probiotics in this population, although a controlled trial in healthy full-term infants showed that D-lactate-producing L. reuteri DSM-17938 did not result in acidosis and probiotic-containing infant formulas were not associated with acidosis.

    “Lack of data in preterm infants led to a caution about using D-lactate-producing probiotics in this population,125 although a controlled trial in healthy full-term infants showed that D-lactate-producing L. reuteri DSM-17938 did not result in acidosis126 and probiotic-containing infant formulas were not associated with acidosis.127”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [126]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papagaroufalis, K., Fotiou, A., Egli, D., Tran, L.-A., & Steenhout, P.
Affiliations
  • General-Maternity District Hospital Helena Venizelou (GR)
  • Nestec (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Steenhout, Philippe
Venue
Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
Published
2014-01
Volume
7
Pages
19-27
ISSN
1178-6388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002527867
Cited by
47
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition and Metabolic Insights (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
D-lactate, D-lactic acidosis, Lactobacillus reuteri, infant formula, non-inferiority, probiotic safety, term infants, blood pH

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review