Cited by 47Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

Is it fair to simply tell parents to use their phones less? A qualitative analysis of parent phone use

Open access
Torres, Chioma, Radesky, Jenny, Levitt, Kimberley J., McDaniel, Brandon T.·2021·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Peer Reviewed

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.15893

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When social systems constrain families' access to these opportunities, caregivers may need to rely on mobile devices for entertainment or stress relief.

    “when social systems constrain families’ access to these opportunities, caregivers may need to rely on mobile devices for entertainment or stress relief.52”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The paper’s table of parent responses describes caregivers using phones for distraction, games and relief during stressful parenting moments. Its discussion also describes phone use as a temporary escape from negative feelings. The paper does not establish that social systems constrain families’ access to other opportunities or that such constraints make caregivers rely on devices. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some caregivers indicate that during moments of frustration with their children, they use their mobile devices to seek parenting advice.

    “some caregivers indicate that during moments of frustration with their children, they use their mobile devices to seek parenting advice.52”

    From Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For families, digital media can provide crucial support, and different uses are not equivalent.

    “Digital media can be a critical source of support for families, and not all ways of using digital media are equivalent.52”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torres, C., Radesky, J., Levitt, K. J., & McDaniel, B. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation (US)
Corresponding author
McDaniel, Brandon T.
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-07
Volume
110
Issue
9
Pages
2594-2596
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W3157628466
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (# 5T32HD079350)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
screen time
MeSH terms
Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Telephone, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review