Cited by 3Infant Development and Preterm CareAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

How does stress affect maternal and paternal perceptions of relationship strain after a preterm birth? Results of a retrospective survey study

Open access
Reimer, Alinda, Mause, Laura, Hoffmann, Jan, Hagemeier, Anna, Dresbach, Till, Scholten, Nadine, Neo‐CamCare·2023·Acta Paediatrica

Abstract

Aim: Strain on couple relationships is associated with a lower well‐being. As premature birth is known to pose stress to parents, this study explores whether interparental relationship strain comes to pass within mothers and fathers during their infant's stay in a neonatal intensive care unit. Methods: A retrospective cross‐sectional survey was conducted with parents who experienced a preterm birth (September to December 2020). Linear regression was used to analyse associations between stress and relationship strain. Results: The study included 437 mothers and 301 fathers. Fathers experienced lower relationship strain (M = 2.49, SD = 1.00) than mothers (M = 3.37, SD = 1.04). Overall, a significant association between relationship strain and stress due to the infant's behaviour and appearance was found for mothers (β = 0.16, p = 0.02) and fathers, with a significantly higher association for fathers (β = 0.27, p ≤ 0.002). With regard to parental role alterations, only mothers showed a significant association (β = 0.21, p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Although mothers showed higher levels of stress and relationship strain, stress may also have an impact on fathers. Therefore, research should focus on stress prevention measures to meet both maternal and paternal needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apa.16664

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reimer, A., Mause, L., Hoffmann, J., Hagemeier, A., Dresbach, T., Scholten, N., & Neo‐CamCare
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Reimer, Alinda
Venue
Acta Paediatrica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-17
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
762-769
ISSN
  • 0365-1436 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-5253
  • 1651-2227
OpenAlex
W4315621372
Cited by
3
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Paediatrica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
preterm birth, parental stress, maternal stress, paternal stress, neonatal intensive care unit, parental role change, infant behavior, gender differences in stress
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Fathers, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mothers, Parents, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review