Exploring occupational well-being profiles, outcomes, and predictors among Chinese teachers: a mixed-methods approach using latent profile and decision tree analysis
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the varied profiles of occupational well‐being, their outcomes, and predictors is key to formulating effective strategies for enhancing teachers' occupational health and well‐being. This study employed latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct occupational well‐being profiles and their outcomes among 366 Chinese teachers, and decision tree analysis to explore the factors predicting each profile. The results showed three occupational well‐being profiles: burnout, engaged, and burnout‐engaged. The “engaged” group exhibited normal ranges for depression and stress, along with mild anxiety. The “burnout” group demonstrated moderate depression and stress, coupled with severe anxiety. The “burnout‐engaged” group was near the threshold of mild depression and moderate anxiety. The result of the decision tree model revealed that marital status, teaching experience, income, role as a class teacher, school type, and working hours significantly influenced these occupational well‐being profiles. Specific combinations of variables were associated with each occupational well‐being profile, offering a nuanced understanding of the risky and protective factors for teacher occupational well‐being. By identifying distinct occupational well‐being profiles among Chinese teachers and their outcomes, and elucidating the key predictors and their interrelations, this study provides insights into how to quickly screen for teachers in need of help at work, and how to design targeted interventions for different teachers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Control variables (gender, age, teaching experience, educational attainment, professional rank) were selected on theoretical and empirical grounds.
“These variables were selected on theoretical and empirical grounds”
From Teaching beliefs and wellbeing among primary school teachers: a moderated mediation of work engagement and career adaptability (2026) · cites this paper as Gao et al., 2024
Cites
The Bioecological Model of Human Development
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114 · Cited by 5,760 · see citing works
The relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Koutsimani, P., Montgomery, A., & Georganta, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284 · Cited by 1,091 · see citing works
Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019
Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Sonnentag, S. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721411434979 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Tuominen-Soini, H., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2014) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033898 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Work Burnout and Engagement Profiles Among Teachers
Salmela-Aro, K., Hietajärvi, L., & Lonka, K. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02254 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, J., & Xu, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1835767
- Authors
- Gao, X., Zhou, X., & Leong, F. T. L.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Normal University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Xiaolu
- Venue
- Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e12640-e12640
- ISSN
- 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-0854
- OpenAlex
- W4405478052
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Keywords
- burnout, teacher engagement, depression, anxiety, stress, marital status, teaching experience, teacher income, class teacher role, school type, working hours, Chinese teachers, occupational health screening
- MeSH terms
- School Teachers, Occupational Stress, Work Engagement, Adult, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, China, Decision Trees, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Health, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review