Cited by 397Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingWork-Family Balance ChallengesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Psychological Detachment From Work During Leisure Time: The Benefits of Mentally Disengaging From Work

Sonnentag, Sabine·2012·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Psychological detachment from work during leisure time refers to a state in which people mentally disconnect from work and do not think about job-related issues when they are away from their job. Empirical research has shown that employees who experience more detachment from work during off-hours are more satisfied with their lives and experience fewer symptoms of psychological strain, without being less engaged while at work. Studies have demonstrated that fluctuations in individuals’ psychological detachment from work can explain fluctuations in their affective states, and have identified positive relations between detachment from work during off-hours and job performance. Trait negative affectivity, high involvement in one’s job, job stressors, and poor environmental conditions are negatively related to psychological detachment from work during off-job time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721411434979

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Employees in these organisations experienced the ability to psychologically detach from work.

    “the employees working in these organisations experienced the ability to psychologically detach from work (Sonnentag, 2012, Dettmers, 2017).”
  • Extensive time spent engaged in work activities suggests that faculty may have little time to psychologically or physically disengage from work, a key element necessary for recovery.

    “Extensive time spent engaged in work activities suggests that faculty may have little time to psychologically or physically disengage from work, a key element necessary for recovery (Sonnentag, 2012; Sonnentag et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sonnentag, S.
Affiliations
University of Mannheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Sonnentag, Sabine
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2012-03-20
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
114-118
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2562290388
Cited by
397
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
psychological detachment, leisure, work-life boundaries, life satisfaction, psychological strain, work engagement, affective states, employee performance, negative affectivity, job involvement, occupational stressors, environmental factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review