The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single cells and bacterial biofilm populations in chronic wound infections
Abstract
Chronic wounds and chronic ulcers are an increasing problem associated with high health care burden and patient burden. The arrested healing of chronic wounds has, in part, been attributed to the presence of biofilms. Substantial research has documented the presence of biofilms in chronic wounds, and many mechanisms of host–pathogen interactions have been uncovered to explain the arrested healing. However, the paradigm of whether biofilms are only observed in chronic infections was recently challenged when biofilms were also observed in acute infections. Here, we characterize the distribution of bacteria in lower leg wounds with particular emphasis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus by confocal laser scanning microscopy combined with PNA‐FISH staining and routine culture of bacteria. We show that 40% of wounds contained either P. aeruginosa or S. aureus biofilms and demonstrate the presence of scattered single cells in tissues stained with a universal bacterial PNA‐FISH probe. Thus, we demonstrate that chronic wounds do not only harbor bacteria organized in biofilms, but also carry populations of scattered single cells and small cell clusters of only a few bacteria. Our findings may influence diagnostic tools being developed to only target biofilms, where single‐cell subpopulations thus may be overlooked and possibly lead to false‐negative results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“PNA-FISH has been established as a productive approach to detect and characterize wound biofilm in human tissues.76-78”
From SEMTWIST Quantification of Biofilm Infection in Human Chronic Wound Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Machine Learning (2025) · cites this paper as [76]
Citations
Cites
Bacterial colonization and healing of venous leg ulcers
Madsen, S. M., Westh, H., Danielsen, L., & Rosdahl, V. T. (1996) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb04955.x · Cited by 164 · cited 1×
“…opportunistic biofilm forming pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus have long been recognized as poor prognostic factors for wound healing [7, 8], and in general the presence of bacterial biofilms has been suggested to contribute to the chronicity of the chronic wounds [9 – 11].”
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1111/wrr.12387 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup4.S4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01089.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archsurg.136.7.765 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12484 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00159.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/wrr.12590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.4.28835 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20 · DOI
- 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.5.273 · DOI
- 10.1128/AAC.40.11.2517 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100080 · DOI
- 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217576 · DOI
- 10.1111/apm.12668 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2180-10-294 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111515 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00122-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12841 · DOI
- 10.1093/femsre/fuac018 · DOI
- 10.2340/00015555-2503 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrmicro2415 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41564-019-0536-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41579-022-00682-4 · DOI
- 10.1128/JCM.00501-08 · DOI
- 10.1128/JCM.01395-09 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00561.x · DOI
- 10.1089/wound.2017.0770 · DOI
- 10.3390/microorganisms10040775 · DOI
- 10.1111/wrr.12401 · DOI
- 10.2340/actadv.v102.201 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms23126526 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, S., Muniz De Oliveira, F., Wang, C., Kumar, M., Xuan, Y., DeMazumder, D., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2025) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2024.0291 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Lichtenberg, M., Kirketerp‐Møller, K., Kvich, L. A., Christensen, M. H., Fritz, B., Jakobsen, T. H., & Bjarnsholt, T.
- Venue
- APMIS
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-17
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1071-1077
- ISSN
- 0903-4641
- 1600-0463
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review