Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single cells and bacterial biofilm populations in chronic wound infections

Lichtenberg, Mads, Kirketerp‐Møller, Klaus, Kvich, Lasse A., Christensen, Mads Holm, Fritz, Blaine, Jakobsen, Tim Holm, Bjarnsholt, Thomas·2024·APMIS

Abstract

Chronic wounds and chronic ulcers are an increasing problem associated with high health care burden and patient burden. The arrested healing of chronic wounds has, in part, been attributed to the presence of biofilms. Substantial research has documented the presence of biofilms in chronic wounds, and many mechanisms of host–pathogen interactions have been uncovered to explain the arrested healing. However, the paradigm of whether biofilms are only observed in chronic infections was recently challenged when biofilms were also observed in acute infections. Here, we characterize the distribution of bacteria in lower leg wounds with particular emphasis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus by confocal laser scanning microscopy combined with PNA‐FISH staining and routine culture of bacteria. We show that 40% of wounds contained either P. aeruginosa or S. aureus biofilms and demonstrate the presence of scattered single cells in tissues stained with a universal bacterial PNA‐FISH probe. Thus, we demonstrate that chronic wounds do not only harbor bacteria organized in biofilms, but also carry populations of scattered single cells and small cell clusters of only a few bacteria. Our findings may influence diagnostic tools being developed to only target biofilms, where single‐cell subpopulations thus may be overlooked and possibly lead to false‐negative results.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apm.13344

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

  • Bacterial colonization and healing of venous leg ulcers

    Madsen, S. M., Westh, H., Danielsen, L., & Rosdahl, V. T. (1996) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb04955.x · Cited by 164 · cited 1×

    “…opportunistic biofilm forming pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus have long been recognized as poor prognostic factors for wound healing [7, 8], and in general the presence of bacterial biofilms has been suggested to contribute to the chronicity of the chronic wounds [9 – 11].”

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.1111/wrr.12387 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup4.S4 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01089.x · DOI
  5. 10.1001/archsurg.136.7.765 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/wrr.12484 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00159.x · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00283.x · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/wrr.12590 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.4.28835 · DOI
  12. 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.1.20 · DOI
  13. 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.5.273 · DOI
  14. 10.1128/AAC.40.11.2517 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.bioflm.2022.100080 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-217576 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/apm.12668 · DOI
  18. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-294 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111515 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00122-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/wrr.12841 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/femsre/fuac018 · DOI
  23. 10.2340/00015555-2503 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/nrmicro2415 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/s41564-019-0536-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41579-022-00682-4 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/JCM.00501-08 · DOI
  29. 10.1128/JCM.01395-09 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00561.x · DOI
  31. 10.1089/wound.2017.0770 · DOI
  32. 10.3390/microorganisms10040775 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/wrr.12401 · DOI
  34. 10.2340/actadv.v102.201 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/ijms23126526 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Lichtenberg, M., Kirketerp‐Møller, K., Kvich, L. A., Christensen, M. H., Fritz, B., Jakobsen, T. H., & Bjarnsholt, T.
Venue
APMIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-17
Volume
132
Issue
12
Pages
1071-1077
ISSN
  • 0903-4641
  • 1600-0463
Cited by
26
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review