Cited by 1,543Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingWound Healing and TreatmentsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

Biofilms in chronic wounds

James, Garth A., Swogger, Ellen, Wolcott, Randall, Pulcini, Elinor deLancey, Secor, Patrick, Sestrich, Jennifer, Costerton, John W., Stewart, Philip S.·2008·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Chronic wounds including diabetic foot ulcers, pressure ulcers, and venous leg ulcers are a worldwide health problem. It has been speculated that bacteria colonizing chronic wounds exist as highly persistent biofilm communities. This research examined chronic and acute wounds for biofilms and characterized microorganisms inhabiting these wounds. Chronic wound specimens were obtained from 77 subjects and acute wound specimens were obtained from 16 subjects. Culture data were collected using standard clinical techniques. Light and scanning electron microscopy techniques were used to analyze 50 of the chronic wound specimens and the 16 acute wound specimens. Molecular analyses were performed on the remaining 27 chronic wound specimens using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequence analysis. Of the 50 chronic wound specimens evaluated by microscopy, 30 were characterized as containing biofilm (60%), whereas only one of the 16 acute wound specimens was characterized as containing biofilm (6%). This was a statistically significant difference ( p <0.001). Molecular analyses of chronic wound specimens revealed diverse polymicrobial communities and the presence of bacteria, including strictly anaerobic bacteria, not revealed by culture. Bacterial biofilm prevalence in specimens from chronic wounds relative to acute wounds observed in this study provides evidence that biofilms may be abundant in chronic wounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2007.00321.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic wound microbial communities are believed to exist predominantly as biofilms.

    “These microbial communities are believed to exist predominantly in the form of a biofilm (166), the composition of which depends on the type of chronic wound; the most prevalent genera in chronic wounds are Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Corynebacterium.”
  • The most prevalent genera in chronic wounds are Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Corynebacterium.

    “the most prevalent genera in chronic wounds are Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Corynebacterium.”
  • The rapidity of the innate immune response and the resulting microbicidal activity are essential to kill planktonic bacteria and to prevent the establishment of biofilms and other stable microbial communities.

    “The rapidity of this response and the resulting microbicidal activity are essential to kill planktonic bacteria and to prevent the establishment of biofilms and other stable microbial communities.18”

    From The Innate Immune System in Acute and Chronic Wounds (2016) · cites this paper as [18]

  • A study found that 60% of clinical samples from chronic infection sites contained biofilms compared with 6% found in acute infections.

    “Interestingly, a study found that 60% of clinical samples from chronic infection sites contained biofilms compared with 6% found in acute infections 38 .”

    From Nanotechnology approaches for global infectious diseases (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
James, G. A., Swogger, E., Wolcott, R., Pulcini, E. D., Secor, P., Sestrich, J., Costerton, J. W., & Stewart, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Southwest Regional Wound Care Center (US)
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-12-13
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
37-44
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2091651320
Cited by
1,543
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 94 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 76
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Montana State University ScholarWorks (Montana State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
biofilm, chronic wounds, diabetic foot ulcer, pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, acute wounds, polymicrobial communities, anaerobic bacteria, wound microbiota, bacterial colonization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Wound Healing, Wounds and Injuries, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review