The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta‐analysis: peri‐operative anti‐ TNF α treatment and post‐operative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Abstract
Summary: Background: The impact of peri‐operative use of TNF α antagonists on post‐operative complications such as infection and wound healing is controversial. Aim: To conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the impact of peri‐operative use of TNF α antagonists on post‐operative complications such as infection and wound healing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ). Methods: A literature search identified studies that investigated post‐operative outcomes in patients with IBD using TNF α antagonists. The primary outcome was the rate of post‐operative infectious complications. Secondary outcomes included the rates of non‐infectious complications and total complications. Odds ratios ( OR ) with 95% confidence intervals ( CI ) are reported. Results: Overall, 18 studies with 4659 participants were eligible for inclusion. Patients with IBD using preoperative anti‐ TNF α therapies had significant increases in post‐operative infectious [ OR 1.56 (95% CI , 1.09–2.24)], non‐infectious [ OR 1.57 (95% CI , 1.14–2.17)] and total complications [ OR 1.73 (95% CI , 1.23–2.43)]. Studies limited to patients with Crohn's disease demonstrated a statistically significant increase in infectious ( OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.28–2.89) and total ( OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.69–2.84) complications, and a trend towards increase in non‐infectious complications ( OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.94–3.17). Studies of patients with ulcerative colitis did not demonstrate significant increases in infectious ( OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.56–3.45), non‐infectious ( OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68–2.85), or total complications ( OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81–1.47). Conclusion: Anti‐ TNF α therapies appear to increase the risk of post‐operative complications. The increase in risk is small, and may well reflect residual confounding rather than a true biological effect. Nevertheless, physicians should exercise caution when continuing biological therapies during the peri‐operative period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tumor Necrosis Factor and Wound Healing
MOONEY, D. P., OʼREILLY, M., & GAMELLI, R. L. (1990) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199002000-00002 · Cited by 144
Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor‐α attenuates wound breaking strength in rats
Lee, R. H., Efron, D. T., Tantry, U., Stuelten, C., Moldawer, L. L., Abouhamze, A., & Barbul, A. (2000) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2000.00547.x · Cited by 63
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Shah, S. C., Colombel, J. ‐., Sands, B. E., & Narula, N. (2016) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.13475 · Cited by 357
Self-citationFood Processing and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Narula, N., Chang, N. H., Mohammad, D., Wong, E. C. L., Ananthakrishnan, A. N., Chan, S. S. M., Carbonnel, F., & Meyer, A. (2023) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.012 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Narula, N., Charleton, D., & Marshall, J. K.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-14
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1057-1064
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W2034126900
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.