Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of a xanthan gum‐based thickener on the swallowing function of patients with dysphagia

Open access
Rofes, L., Arreola, V., Mukherjee, R., Swanson, J., Clavé, P.·2014·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: Increasing bolus viscosity of thin liquids is a basic therapeutic strategy to protect patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) from aspiration. However, conventional starch thickeners increase post‐deglutitive residue. Aim: To assess the therapeutic effect of a new xanthan gum‐based thickener, Resource ThickenUp Clear (Nestlé Health Science, Vevey, Switzerland) on patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Methods: We studied the effect of Resource ThickenUp Clear using a clinical method and videofluoroscopy on 120 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (66 with stroke, 41 older and 13 with neurodegenerative diseases) and 14 healthy volunteers while swallowing thin‐liquid, nectar‐like and spoon‐thick boluses. We assessed the prevalence of signs of impaired safety and efficacy of swallow and the physiology of the swallow response. Results: Increasing bolus viscosity with Resource ThickenUp Clear: (i) improved safety of swallow demonstrated by a reduction in the prevalence of cough and voice changes in the clinical study and penetrations and aspirations during video fluoroscopy. Prevalence of aspirations was 12.7% with thin liquid, 7.7% with nectar‐like (P < 0.01) and 3.4% with spoon‐thick (P < 0.01) viscosities. Penetration–Aspiration Scale was reduced from 3.24 ± 0.18 at thin liquid to 2.20 ± 0.18 at nectar‐like (P < 0.001) and to 1.53 ± 0.13 at spoon‐thick (P < 0.001) viscosities; (ii) did not enhance pharyngeal residue; (iii) nectar‐like viscosity did not affect bolus velocity nor timing of swallow response and (iv) spoon‐thick viscosity reduced bolus velocity. Conclusions: Resource ThickenUp Clear improves the safety of swallow without increasing residue providing a viscosity‐dependent therapeutic effect for patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. At nectar viscosity, the effect is due to intrinsic texture properties, spoon‐thick viscosity adding changes in swallow physiology. NCT 01158313.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.12696

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Rofes, L., Arreola, V., Mukherjee, R., Swanson, J., & Clavé, P.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-13
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
1169-1179
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2104138146
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.