The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distinct phenotype of hepatotoxicity associated with illicit use of anabolic androgenic steroids
Abstract
Summary: Background: We have observed an increase in hepatotoxicity (DILI) reporting related to the use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) for bodybuilding. Aim: To characterise phenotype presentation, outcome and severity of AAS DILI. Methods: Data on 25 cases of AAS DILI reported to the Spanish (20) and Latin‐American (5) DILI Registries were collated and compared with previously published cases. Results: AAS DILI increased from representing less than 1% of the total cases in the Spanish DILI Registry in the period 2001–2009 to 8% in 2010–2013. Young men (mean age 32 years), requiring hospitalisation, hepatocellular injury and jaundice were predominating features among the AAS cases. AAS DILI caused significantly higher bilirubin values independent of type of damage when compared to other drug classes ( P = 0.001). Furthermore, the cholestatic AAS cases presented significantly higher mean peak bilirubin ( P = 0.029) and serum creatinine values ( P = 0.0002), compared to the hepatocellular cases. In a logistic regression model, the interaction between peak bilirubin values and cholestatic damage was associated with the development of AAS‐induced acute kidney impairment (AKI) [OR 1.26 (95% CI: 1.035–1.526); P = 0.021], with 21.5 ×ULN being the best bilirubin cut‐off point for predicting AKI risk (AUCROC 0.92). No fatalities occurred. Conclusions: Illicit recreational AAS use is a growing cause of reported DILI that can lead to severe hepatic and renal injury. AAS DILI is associated with a distinct phenotype, characterised by considerable bilirubin elevations independent of type of damage. Although hepatocellular injury predominates, acute kidney injury develops in cholestatic cases with pronounced jaundice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the US, HDS accounts for approximately 20% of DILI cases, ranking second, and 8-16% in Europe and Latin America.
“In the US, HDS accounts for approximately 20% of DILI cases, ranking second [123], and 8-16% in Europe and Latin America [3,124,125].”
From Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [125]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1177/106002809202600414 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546503262202 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.carpath.2011.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091340 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01579.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00004836-200210000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsm.2004.013599 · DOI
- Hardt A, 2012, Development of hepatocellular carcinoma associated with anabolic androgenic steroid abuse in a young bodybuilder: a case report, Case Rep Pathol, 2012, 195607
- 10.1249/00005768-199401000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318188be6d · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90124-A · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/clpt.2011.58 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.01.009 · DOI
- 10.1038/bjp.2008.165 · DOI
- 10.1093/toxsci/kfq269 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.047 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.046 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80428-5 · DOI
- Sellinger M, 1990, Sulfated bile acids inhibit Na(+)‐H+ antiport in human kidney brush‐border membrane vesicles, Am J Physiol, 258, F986
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hep.20800 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014 · Cited by 1,276
Self-citationDrug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes
Hoofnagle, J. H., & Björnsson, E. S. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1816149 · Cited by 652
Hepatotoxicity by Dietary Supplements: A Tabular Listing and Clinical Characteristics
García-Cortés, M., Robles-Díaz, M., Ortega-Alonso, A., Medina-Caliz, I., & Andrade, R. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17040537 · Cited by 179
Self-citationChinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update
Mao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, C., Liu, X., Su, M., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Robles‐Diaz, M., Gonzalez‐Jimenez, A., Medina‐Caliz, I., Stephens, C., García‐Cortes, M., García‐Muñoz, B., Ortega‐Alonso, A., Blanco‐Reina, E., Gonzalez‐Grande, R., Jimenez‐Perez, M., Rendón, P., Navarro, J. M., Gines, P., Prieto, M., Garcia‐Eliz, M., Bessone, F., Brahm, J. R., Paraná, R., Lucena, M. I., Andrade, R. J., the Spanish DILI Registry, & the SLatinDILI Network
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-13
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-125
- ISSN
- 0269-2813
- 1365-2036
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review