Cited by 84Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and Transplantation

Cirrhosis is under-recognised in patients subsequently diagnosed with hepatocellular cancer

Open access
Walker, M., El‐Serag, H. B., Sada, Y., Mittal, S., Ying, J., Duan, Z., Richardson, P., Davila, J. A. +1 more·2016·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for HCC in patients with cirrhosis. However, patients with compensated cirrhosis are often asymptomatic and may remain unrecognised for years. AIMS: To determine the extent to which cirrhosis is unrecognised in a US Veteran population with HCC, and to evaluate the association between lack of cirrhosis recognition and stage of HCC at diagnosis. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic medical records of a random sample of HCC cases diagnosed in the national Veterans Affairs system between 2005 and 2011. We conducted multivariable analyses adjusting for patients' demographics, comorbidity, aetiology of underlying disease and healthcare utilisation including HCC surveillance. RESULTS: Of 1201 patients with HCC and cirrhosis, 24.6% had unrecognised cirrhosis prior to HCC diagnosis. Older patients [>65 years, odds ratio (OR) 2.32], African Americans (OR 1.93), patients with alcoholic or NAFLD liver disease (OR 1.69 and 4.77 respectively), HIV (OR 3.02), and fewer comorbidities (Deyo 0 vs. 3, OR 2.42) had significantly higher odds of having unrecognised cirrhosis than comparison groups. Furthermore, patients with unrecognised cirrhosis were 6.5 times more likely to have advanced stage HCC at diagnosis. The effect of cirrhosis recognition on HCC stage remained significant after adjusting for pre-specified covariates (OR 3.37). CONCLUSIONS: In one quarter of patients, cirrhosis was unrecognised prior to HCC diagnosis, and this group was significantly more likely to have advanced stage HCC. These findings emphasise the importance of timely evaluation for cirrhosis in at-risk populations as a critical step to improving outcomes for patients with HCC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.13505

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cirrhosis in MASLD is under-recognised compared to other aetiologies, with less than one in four individuals with cirrhosis undergoing HCC surveillance.

    “Cirrhosis in MASLD is under-recognised compared to other aetiologies, 248 with less than one in four individuals with cirrhosis undergoing HCC surveillance. 249”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [248]

    The Discussion reports that NAFLD-related cirrhosis was more likely to go unrecognized than HCV-related cirrhosis, supporting the comparison with HCV but not necessarily with every other aetiology. The Results report surveillance-related testing in 18.5% of patients with unrecognized cirrhosis, versus 61.4% of those with recognized cirrhosis; the Discussion reports 51% for the study cohort overall. Thus, fewer than one in four does not describe all individuals with cirrhosis. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, M., El‐Serag, H. B., Sada, Y., Mittal, S., Ying, J., Duan, Z., Richardson, P., Davila, J. A., & Kanwal, F.
Affiliations
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Davila, J. A.
  • Kanwal, F.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
621-630
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2292458278
Cited by
84
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA160738)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
Keywords
liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC surveillance, veterans, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, HIV, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Female, Health Services, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Diseases, Alcoholic, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Socioeconomic Factors, Veterans, Comorbidity, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review