Cited by 0Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisArchaeological and Geological StudiesAmazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crossing Ceramic Decoration Boundaries: Compositional and Morphological Analyses of the Mortuary Assemblage From Maridíaz (Nariño, Colombia)

Open access
Klesner, Catherine, Cárdenas‐Arroyo, Felipe, Crawford, Rosie, Hay, Faith‐Lyn, Martinón‐Torres, Marcos·2026·Archaeometry

Abstract

This paper examines the interaction of two ware traditions in the Maridíaz mortuary assemblage (Pasto, Nariño, Colombia), a rare, well‐documented cemetery context in which Piartal, Tuza, and hybrid vessels co‐occur. Using portable X‐ray fluorescence ( n = 39) and 3D geometric morphometrics ( n = 25), we find shared ceramic compositions, supporting continuity in raw‐material selection and fabric preparation, whereas there are notable differences in the finishing stages of production across the wares (slips, pigments and finishing techniques). Morphological data demonstrate contrasting trends in intervessel and intravessel variation in vessels. Compositional and morphological data show that ‘hybrid’ vessels from Tomb 27 combine both ware traits in distinct ways. Together, these results refine the interactions of makers of both wares, suggesting the selective recombining of techniques rather than following one technological tradition wholesale, and with differential intravessel consistency occurring alongside sustained diversity among makers within a shared community of practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/arcm.70219

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bernal Vélez A., 2011, Cronología Cerámica y Caracterización de Asentamientos Prehispánicos en el Centro Andino del Departamento de Nariño: Investigaciones arqueológicas en Yacuanquer y Pasto
  2. Cadavid Camargo G., 1992, Arqueología de Salvamento en la Vereda de Tajumbina, Municipio de La Cruz (Nariño)
  3. Cárdenas‐Arroyo F., 1989, Complejos Cerámicos y TerritoriosÉtnicos en Áreas Arqueológicas de Nariño, Boletín de Arqueología, 4, 27
  4. Cárdenas‐Arroyo F., 1992, Pastos y Quillacingas: Dos Grupos Etnicos en Buscade Identidad Arqueologica, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 24, 65
  5. Cárdenas‐Arroyo F., 1995, Perspectivas Regionales en la Arqueología del Suroccidente de Colombia y Norte del Ecuador, 49
  6. Cárdenas‐Arroyo F., 1998, IDB Cultural Center Lectures Program, 1
  7. Cárdenas‐Arroyo F., 2020, Arqueología del Valle de Atríz (Nariño, Colombia)
  8. Cavelier I., 2019, Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Nariño (Colombia), 9
  9. Costin C. L., 1991, Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production, Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1
  10. Francisco A. E., 1969, An Archaeological Sequence From Carchi, Ecuador
  11. Grijalva C. E., 1937, La Expedición de Max Uhle a Cuasmal, o Sea la Protohistoria de Imbabura y Carchi
  12. Groot de Mahecha A. M., 1991, Intento de Delimitación del Territorio de los Grupos Étnicos Pastos y Quillacingas en el Altiplano Nariñense
  13. IGAC, 2022, Base de Datos Vectorial Básica. Colombia. Escala 1:100.000
  14. Jijón y Caamaño J., 1952, Antropología Prehispánica del Ecuador
  15. Langebaek Rueda C., 2003, Procesos de Poblamiento en Yacuanquer‐Nariño: Una Investigación Arqueológica Sobre la Microverticalidad en los Andes Colombianos: Siglos X a XVIII d. C
  16. Lleras Pérez R., 2007, El Tiempo en los Andes del Norte de Ecuador y Sur de Colombia: Un Análisis de la Cronología a la luz de Nuevos Datos, Boletín del Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino, 12, 61
  17. Maya Cabrera M. C., 2024, Proyecto: Visita ICANH, Rescate Hallazgo Fortuito en el Centro de Investigaciones AGROSAVIA Sitio Arqueológico CIAO21
  18. Ortíz S. E., 1937, Notas Arqueológicas: la Necropolis del ‘Cerrillo’–Una Historia Figurada, Idearium, 1, 142
  19. Patiño D., 1994, El Altiplano Nariñense, el Valle de Sibundoy y la Ceja de Montaña Andina en al Putumayo: Investigaciones de Arqueología de Rescate, Cespedesia, 20, 115
  20. Posit Team, 2025, RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R
  21. QGIS Development Team, 2023, QGIS Geographic Information System
  22. Shepard A., 1954, Ceramics for the Archaeologist
  23. Uhle M., 1933, Estudio Sobre las Civilizaciones del Carchi e Imbabura
  24. Uribe M. V., 1977, Asentamientos Prehispanicos en el Altiplano de Ipiales, Colombia, Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 21, 57
  25. Uribe M. V., 1983, Las Etnias Prehispánicas del altiplano de Ipiales, Colombia: Consideraciones Finales, Boletín de Antropología, 5, 261

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Klesner, C., Cárdenas‐Arroyo, F., Crawford, R., Hay, F., & Martinón‐Torres, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Research Affiliate, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Klesner, Catherine
Venue
Archaeometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-09-23
ISSN
  • 0003-813X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4754
OpenAlex
W7214120327
Cited by
0
References
9
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Archaeometry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/V011685/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
Keywords
ceramic decoration, ceramic composition, ceramic morphology, pottery production techniques, communities of practice, raw material selection, Nariño

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review