The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-chain fatty acids as feed supplements for sustainable aquaculture: an updated view
Abstract
Restriction or ban on antibiotic administration in aquaculture encourages the development of environment-friendly feed additives as immunostimulants. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and their salts are ‘Generally Regarded as Safe’ and are often used as antimicrobials in the livestock feed industry. Formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate and their salts are among the most studied SCFAs in aquaculture. These SCFAs affect the host performance as well as physiological response upon three ways: either through effects of the feeds that are being administered, through effects on the gastrointestinal tract of the animal or through direct effects on metabolism. To date, most of the available data are focused on the effects of SCFAs on growth performance and feed utilization. Despite extensive research studies on the effects of the different type of SCFAs and their salts on growth performance and feed utilization, the effects of these feed additives on the health of aquatic organisms have only been receiving attention recently. The results of the studies demonstrated beneficial effects of SCFAs as promising feed additives in aquaculture. The present review article summarizes and discusses the topic of dietary administration of SCFAs and their salts in aquaculture with a closer look at the recent findings regarding the effects of SCFAs on growth performance and health status of fish and shellfish. Furthermore, this review identifies the gaps of existing knowledge regarding the roles of SCFAs in the growth and health status of aquatic animals and suggests research areas that merit further investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diet, gut microbiota and immune responses
Maslowski, K. M., & Mackay, C. R. (2011) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni0111-5 · Cited by 1,261 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, recent findings revealed that SCFAs alter the immune response through binding to G protein-coupled receptor, GPR43, which is expressed mainly on innate immune response and inflammatory cells (Maslowski & Mackay 2012).”
BackgroundNew insight into butyrate metabolism
Knudsen, K. E. B., Serena, A., Canibe, N., & Juntunen, K. S. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002212 · Cited by 134
Cited by
Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., Wang, A., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02429 · Cited by 601
Self-citationSustainable aquaculture requires environmental‐friendly treatment strategies for fish diseases
Lieke, T., Meinelt, T., Hoseinifar, S. H., Pan, B., Straus, D. L., & Steinberg, C. E. W. (2020) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12365 · Cited by 363
Self-citationHost-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., & Caipang, C. M.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-30
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1380-1391
- ISSN
- 1355-557X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2558738147
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-chain fatty acids as feed supplements for sustainable aquaculture: an updated view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/are.13239
- The paper
- Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., & Caipang, C. M. (2017). Short-chain fatty acids as feed supplements for sustainable aquaculture: an updated view. Aquaculture Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.