Cited by 61Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsAnthropology: Ethics, History, CultureHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doing fieldwork the Chinese way: a returning researcher's insider/outsider status in her home town

Zhao, Yawei·2017·Area

Abstract

Insider/outsider status has been recognised in geographical literature as an important aspect of positionality on which researchers should reflect critically. Based on my fieldwork experience in Dali, southwest China, this paper articulates an account of the co‐existence of ‘insiderness’ and ‘outsiderness’ during the research process in a way that adds nuance to scholarly challenges to conceptions of insider/outsider status as an oppositional binary. I touch on several dilemmas that arose over the course of my fieldwork in my home town, such as working with local research assistants, ‘encountering’ a Western supervisor in the field and interviewing local people. I argue that interacting in the field with people from different ethnic, professional or socioeconomic characteristics dynamises a researcher's insider/outsider position, bringing his or her in‐between position to the fore. In this paper, I highlight the tensions and negotiations arising from my experience of in‐betweenness in Dali. I also point out several particularities of doing fieldwork in China by referring to Chinese ways of thinking and communication, and analyse how insiderness complicates the research process with particular regard to China. Finally, I conclude that working in the field is not only a process of data collection, but also a process of learning ‘who I am’.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/area.12314

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1080/14631360701595007 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1468794112468474 · DOI
  3. Botterill K, 2015, ‘We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are’: questioning the ‘outsider’ in Polish migration research, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16
  4. 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00389.x · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.0129-7619.2004.00172.x · DOI
  6. 10.1080/0966369X.2011.649348 · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01420.x · DOI
  8. 10.1080/0966369X.2014.939157 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/1467-9493.00153 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/10941665.2011.613207 · DOI
  11. Dowling R, 2005, Qualitative research methods in human geography, 19
  12. 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00506.x · DOI
  14. Fonow M M, 1991, Beyond methodology: feminist scholarship as lived research, 10.2979/1211.0 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00003-0 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2006.00221.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/gec3.12219 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF00645319 · DOI
  19. 10.4135/9781412985505 · DOI
  20. Ite U, 1997, Postgraduate fieldwork in developing areas: a rough guide, 75
  21. 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x · DOI
  22. 10.1080/0966369X.2014.958063 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1080/08873631.2014.906852 · DOI
  24. Lee‐Wong S M, 2000, Politeness and face in Chinese culture
  25. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00843.x · DOI
  26. 10.1080/03098269708725444 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/02601370120490 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1177/1466138114533466 · DOI
  29. Mohammed R, 2001, Qualitative methods for geographers: issues and debates, 101
  30. 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00025-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00054.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/0004918042000249476 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/sjtg.12005_6 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/01419870701491952 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/07908310608668758 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00457.x · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2010.01425.x · DOI
  38. 10.1111/area.12017 · DOI
  39. 10.17730/humo.49.1.h1m8642ln1843n45 · DOI
  40. Yang K, 1957, The origin and formation of Bai in Yunnan
  41. Zheng H, 2011, A pragmatic analysis of interruptions in speech act, Journal of Hunan First Normal University, 11, 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 61

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Y.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yawei
Venue
Area
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-21
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
185-191
ISSN
  • 0004-0894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4762
OpenAlex
W2598572924
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Area (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Geographical Thought
Keywords
insider and outsider, researcher positionality, in-betweenness, Dali, reflexivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doing fieldwork the Chinese way: a returning researcher's insider/outsider status in her home town. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/area.12314
The paper
Zhao, Y. (2017). Doing fieldwork the Chinese way: a returning researcher's insider/outsider status in her home town. Area. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12314