Cited by 335Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessHigher Education Research Studies

Academic Self‐Efficacy and Performance of Underrepresented STEM Majors: Gender, Ethnic, and Social Class Patterns

MacPhee, David, Farro, Samantha, Canetto, Silvia Sara·2013·Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined academic self‐efficacy and performance among Science/Technology/Engineering/Math (STEM) majors who are underrepresented in STEM education and occupations; i.e., women, specific ethnic minorities, and low‐socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. Performance on academic tests and self‐perceptions of academic skills were assessed at admission and graduation from a STEM mentoring program. At admission, women perceived themselves as academically weaker than men despite similar academic performance. However, by graduation, women's academic self‐efficacy was equivalent to men's. In addition, students with double STEM‐minority statuses, by ethnicity and SES, had lower academic self‐efficacy and performance than d id students with single STEM‐minority status. Exploratory analyses of change over time by ethnic/SES groups showed varying patterns of change that depended on the outcome variable. This study's finding of an increase in academic self‐efficacy for women and students with STEM‐minority status by both ethnicity and SES at graduation from a mentoring program is perhaps an indication of the positive impact of mentoring. The mixed findings at program completion for students with single versus double STEM‐minority status call for attention to the complex relationship between social disadvantage, academic self‐efficacy, and academic performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/asap.12033

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
MacPhee, David
Venue
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
347-369
ISSN
  • 1529-7489 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-2415
OpenAlex
W1629258564
Cited by
335
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
19.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
Keywords
academic self-efficacy, STEM majors, underrepresented students, women in STEM, ethnic minorities, low socioeconomic status, mentoring programs, academic performance, gender differences, social class, intersectionality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review