Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Not‐So‐Common‐Wealth of Australia: Evidence for a Cross‐Cultural Desire for a More Equal Distribution of Wealth

Norton, Michael I., Neal, David T., Govan, Cassandra L., Ariely, Dan, Holland, Elise·2014·Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that Americans underestimate wealth inequality in the United States and favor a more equal wealth distribution (Norton & Ariely, ). Does this pattern reflect ideological dynamics unique to the United States, or is the phenomenon evident in other developed economies—such as Australia? We assessed Australians’ perceived and ideal wealth distributions and compared them to the actual wealth distribution. Although the United States and Australia differ in the degree of actual wealth inequality and in cultural narratives around economic mobility, the Australian data closely replicated the United States findings. Misperceptions of wealth inequality as well as preferences for more equal distributions may be common across developed economies. In addition, beliefs about wealth distribution only weakly predicted support for raising the minimum wage, suggesting that attitudes toward inequality may not translate into preferences for redistributive policies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/asap.12058

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1017/S1537592705050036 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1177/0956797612450035 · DOI
  3. Kumhof M. &Ranciere R.(2010).Inequality leverage and crises. IMF Working Paper 10/268. · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x · DOI
  5. 10.1177/1745691611406922 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01810.x · DOI
  7. OECD. (2011).Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising OECD Publishing. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119536‐en · DOI
  8. 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.072066 · DOI
  9. 10.4159/9780674042605 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1177/0956797611434540 · DOI
  11. 10.1017/S0007123400004506 · DOI
  12. Wilkinson R. G., 2009, The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard Business School
  • Empirica Research
  • Empirica Research and The University of Melbourne
  • Duke University
  • The University of Melbourne
Venue
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-17
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
339-351
ISSN
  • 1529-7489
  • 1530-2415
Cited by
59
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Not‐So‐Common‐Wealth of Australia: Evidence for a Cross‐Cultural Desire for a More Equal Distribution of Wealth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/asap.12058
The paper
Norton, M. I., Neal, D. T., Govan, C. L., Ariely, D., & Holland, E. (2014). The Not‐So‐Common‐Wealth of Australia: Evidence for a Cross‐Cultural Desire for a More Equal Distribution of Wealth. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12058