Cited by 131Poisoning and overdose treatmentsDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of the UK's revised paracetamol poisoning management guidelines on admissions, adverse reactions and costs of treatment

Open access

Abstract

Aims: In S eptember 2012 the UK's Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) recommended changes in the management of paracetamol poisoning: use of a single ‘100 mg l−1’ nomogram treatment line, ceasing risk assessment, treating all staggered/uncertain ingestions and increasing the duration of the initial acetylcysteine (NAC) infusion from 15 to 60 min. We evaluated the effect of this on presentation, admission, treatment, adverse reactions and costs of paracetamol poisoning. Methods: Data were prospectively collected from adult patients presenting to three large UK hospitals from 3 S eptember 2011 to 3 S eptember 2013 (year before and after change). Infusion duration effect on vomiting and anaphylactoid reactions was examined in one centre. A cost analysis from an NHS perspective was performed for 90 000 patients/annum with paracetamol overdose. Results: There were increases in the numbers presenting to hospital (before 1703, after 1854; increase 8.9% [95% CI 1.9, 16.2], P = 0.011); admitted (1060/1703 [62.2%] vs. 1285/1854 [69.3%]; increase 7.1% [4.0, 10.2], P < 0.001) and proportion treated (626/1703 [36.8%] vs. 926/1854 [50.0%]; increase: 13.2% [95% CI 10.0, 16.4], P < 0.001). Increasing initial NAC infusion did not change the proportion of treated patients developing adverse reactions (15 min 87/323 [26.9%], 60 min 145/514 [28.2%]; increase: 1.3% [95% CI –4.9, 7.5], P = 0.682). Across the UK the estimated cost impact is £8.3 million (6.4 million–10.2 million) annually, with a cost‐per‐life saved of £17.4 million (13.4 million–21.5 million). Conclusions: The changes introduced by the CHM in S eptember 2012 have increased the numbers of patients admitted to hospital and treated with acetylcysteine without reducing adverse reactions. A safety and cost‐benefit review of the CHM guidance is warranted, including novel treatment protocols and biomarkers in the assessment of poisoning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.12362

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Waring WS, 2006, Paracetamol appears to protect against N‐acetylcysteine‐induced anaphylactoid reactions, Clin Toxicol, 44, 441
  2. Adams RD, 2014, Paracetamol excess related to dental pain in adults – NPIS enquiries pre and post MHRA guideline changes, Clin Toxicol, 52, 391

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bateman, D. N., Carroll, R., Pettie, J., Yamamoto, T., Elamin, M. E. M. O., Peart, L., Dow, M., Coyle, J., Cranfield, K. R., Hook, C., Sandilands, E. A., Veiraiah, A., Webb, D., Gray, A., Dargan, P. I., Wood, D. M., Thomas, S. H. L., Dear, J. W., & Eddleston, M.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bateman, D. Nicholas
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-21
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
610-618
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2119604663
Cited by
131
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2012-05-189)
  • Scottish Funding Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
acetaminophen toxicity, acetaminophen overdose, N-acetylcysteine, treatment guidelines, hospitalization, adverse drug reactions, anaphylactoid reactions, treatment costs, cost per life saved, guideline implementation
MeSH terms
Acetaminophen, Acetylcysteine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidotes, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Health Care Costs, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review