Cited by 25Ethics in Clinical ResearchCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic on the conduct of clinical trials: Return to normalcy by considering the practical impact of a structured ethical analysis

Open access
Vissers, Maurits F.J.M., Cohen, Adam F., Van Gerven, Joop M.A., Groeneveld, Geert Jan·2021·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

During the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic many clinical trials were abruptly halted. Measures to contain the pandemic are currently taking effect and societies in general and healthcare systems in particular are considering how to return to normalcy. This opens up the discussion when and how clinical trials should be restarted while the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet resolved, and what should happen in case of a resurgence of the virus in the coming months. This article uses the four ethical principles framework as a structured approach to come to a set of practical, ethically grounded guidelines for halting and relaunching clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic. The framework applied provides a structured approach for all clinical trials stakeholders and thereby prevents unclear reasoning in a complex situation. While it is essential to prevent the virus from resurging and focus on developing a COVID-19 treatment as soon as possible, it is just as important to our society that we continue developing new drugs for other conditions. In this article we argue that the situation for clinical trials is not essentially different from the pre-COVID-19 era and that an overcautious approach will have negative consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.14480

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products during COVID-19 Pandemic. Guidance for Industry, Investigators, and Institutional Review Boards. Published online 2020.
  2. Bonten M. Preoperatieve screening voor COVID-19. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020;164:C4534. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol. 2020201365#tbl1 · DOI
  3. Rothman K, Lash T, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  4. Barrasa H, Rello J, Tejada S, et al. SARS-Cov-2 in Spanish intensive care: early experience with 15-day survival in Vitoria. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med Published online. 2020;S2352-5568(20):30064-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32278670/
  5. Xu H, Yan L, Qiu C, et al. Analysis and prediction of false negative results for SARS-CoV-2 detection with pharyngeal swab specimen in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study. medRxiv. Published online March 30, 2020:2020.03.26.20043042. https://www.medrxiv.org/ content/10.1101/2020.03.26.20043042v1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vissers, M. F. J. M., Cohen, A. F., Van Gerven, J. M. A., & Groeneveld, G. J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Leiden University Medical Center Albinusdreef 2 Leiden ZA 2333 The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Vissers, Maurits F.J.M.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-26
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
837-844
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W3043805919
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, research ethics, ethical analysis, pandemic containment measures, COVID-19 resurgence, drug development, research ethics guidelines
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Research Design, Ethical Analysis, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review