Prevalence of cognitive impairment in major depression and bipolar disorder
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The current study examines prevalence of cognitive impairment in four mood disorder samples, using four definitions of impairment. The impact of premorbid IQ on prevalence was examined, and the influence of treatment response. Methods: Samples were: (i) 58 inpatients in a current severe depressive episode (unipolar or bipolar), (ii) 69 unmedicated outpatients in a mild to moderate depressive episode (unipolar or bipolar), (iii) 56 outpatients with bipolar disorder, in a depressive episode, and (iv) 63 outpatients with bipolar disorder, currently euthymic. Cognitive assessment was conducted after treatment in Studies 1 (6 weeks of antidepressant treatment commenced on admission) and 2 (16‐week course of cognitive behaviour therapy or schema therapy), allowing the impact of treatment response to be assessed. All mood disorder samples were compared with healthy control groups. Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment was highest for the inpatient depression sample (Study 1), and lowest for the outpatient depression sample (Study 2). Substantial variability in rates was observed depending on the definition of impairment used. Correcting cognitive performance for premorbid IQ had a significant impact on the prevalence of cognitive impairment in the inpatient depression sample. There was minimal evidence that treatment response impacted on prevalence of cognitive impairment, except in the domain of psychomotor speed in inpatients. Conclusions: As interventions aiming to improve cognitive outcomes in mood disorders receive increasing research focus, the issue of setting a cut‐off level of cognitive impairment for screening purposes becomes a priority. This analysis demonstrates important differences in samples likely to be recruited depending on the definition of cognitive impairment and begins to examine the importance of premorbid IQ in determining who is impaired.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive impairment can be profound in Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease.
“The observed impairment can be profound, as in Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease (PD), or relatively mild, as in depression (Brown & Marsden, 1990; Caviness et al., 2007; Douglas et al., 2018; Petersen et al., 2001).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Douglas et al., 2018
Cognitive impairment can be relatively mild in depression.
“The observed impairment can be profound, as in Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease (PD), or relatively mild, as in depression (Brown & Marsden, 1990; Caviness et al., 2007; Douglas et al., 2018; Petersen et al., 2001).”
From Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive functioning in brain disorders: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Douglas et al., 2018
Cites
Albert, M. S., DeKosky, S. T., Dickson, D., Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Fox, N. C., Gamst, A., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W. J., Petersen, R. C., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008 · Cited by 10,152 · see citing works
A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity
Young, R. C., Biggs, J. T., Ziegler, V. E., & Meyer, D. A. (1978) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.133.5.429 · Cited by 8,744 · see citing works
Shilyansky, C., Williams, L. M., Gyurak, A., Harris, A., Usherwood, T., & Etkin, A. (2016) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)00012-2 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Longitudinal Assessment of Neuropsychological Function in Major Depression
Douglas, K. M., & Porter, R. J. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/00048670903279887 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationJacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., Revenstorf, D., Hahlweg, K., Baucom, D. H., & Margolin, G. (1984) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.52.4.497 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Baune, B. T., & Renger, L. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.013 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Malhi, G. S., Bell, E., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Hazell, P., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Porter, R., et al. (2021) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867420979353 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Self-citationBegemann, M. J., Brand, B. A., Ćurčić-Blake, B., Aleman, A., & Sommer, I. E. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720003670 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Nikolin, S., Tan, Y. Y., Schwaab, A., Moffa, A., Loo, C. K., & Martin, D. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.084 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Cognitive impairment and neurocognitive profiles in major depression: A clinical perspective
Hammar, Å., Ronold, E. H., & Rekkedal, G. Å. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.764374 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Petersen, J. Z., Porter, R. J., & Miskowiak, K. W. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.105 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationLai, S., Zhong, S., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xue, Y., Zhao, H., Ran, H., Yan, S., Luo, Y., He, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.153 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Dealing with heterogeneity of cognitive dysfunction in acute depression: A clustering approach
Vicent-Gil, M., Portella, M. J., Serra-Blasco, M., Navarra-Ventura, G., Crivillés, S., Aguilar, E., Palao, D., & Cardoner, N. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291720001567 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Douglas, K. M., Gallagher, P., Robinson, L. J., Carter, J. D., McIntosh, V. V., Frampton, C. M., Watson, S., Young, A. H., Ferrier, I. N., & Porter, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- University of Canterbury (NZ)
- King's College London (GB)
- Canterbury District Health Board (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Douglas, Katie M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Bipolar Disorders
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-18
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-274
- ISSN
- 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-5618
- OpenAlex
- W2792445510
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Health Research Council of New Zealand
- Stanley Medical Research Institute (REF: 03T‐429)
- Medical Research Council
- Tertiary Education Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- cognitive impairment, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, prevalence, premorbid intelligence, treatment response, antidepressant treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, schema therapy, psychomotor speed, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Prevalence, Treatment Outcome, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review