Cited by 60Work-Family Balance ChallengesEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLabor Law and Work Dynamics

“Oh! Teleworking!”. Regimes of engagement and the lived experience of female Spanish teleworkers.

Gálvez, Ana, Tirado, Francisco, Alcaraz, Jose M.·2020·Business Ethics A European Review

Abstract

Abstract This research explores female teleworkers' domestic and work experiences in their day‐to‐day lives. We draw on focus groups and interviews carried out in Spain and use thepragmatic regimes of engagementframework developed by Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot to analyse them. Their model further develops contributions from post‐humanist discourse (specially from G. Deleuze, F. Guattari and A. Badiou) and from the so‐called “empirical ethics”. This allows us to explore important issues about the temporal‐spatial and material worlds that shape the daily lives of these women, their perceived agential capacities, and their moral and ethical considerations regarding telework. Our paper contributes to the existing critically oriented (qualitative, interpretative) body of work that examines teleworkers’ lived experience by providing and illustrating important clues for examining ethical issues on work–life balance and gender roles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/beer.12240

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Telework raises ethical concerns for e-leaders, such as exploitation of employees with work and information overload that overlap with domestic and work settings, resulting in an intrusion into employees' personal life.

    “Finally, telework raise ethical concerns for e-leaders, such as exploitation of employees with work and information overload that overlap with domestic and work settings, resulting in an intrusion into employees’ personal life (Cortellazzo et al., 2019; Gálvez et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gálvez, A., Tirado, F., & Alcaraz, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Munich Business School (DE)
Corresponding author
Gálvez, Ana
Venue
Business Ethics A European Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-16
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
180-192
ISSN
  • 0962-8770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8608
OpenAlex
W2968810278
Cited by
60
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
14.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business Ethics A European Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
remote work, regimes of engagement, Boltanski and Thévenot, posthumanism, empirical ethics, work-life balance, gender roles, domestic work, lived experience, Spanish women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review