Cited by 50Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for clinically distressed health care workers: Waitlist‐controlled evaluation of an ACT workshop in a routine practice setting

Waters, Cerith S., Frude, Neil, Flaxman, Paul E., Boyd, Jane·2018·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of a 1-day acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) workshop on the mental health of clinically distressed health care employees, and to explore ACT's processes of change in a routine practice setting. DESIGN: A quasi-controlled design, with participants block allocated to an ACT intervention or waiting list control group based on self-referral date. METHODS: Participants were 35 health care workers who had self-referred for the ACT workshop via a clinical support service for staff. Measures were completed by ACT and control group participants at pre-intervention and 3 months post-intervention. Participants allocated to the waitlist condition went on to receive the ACT intervention and were also assessed 3 months later. RESULTS: At 3 months post-intervention, participants in the ACT group reported a significantly lower level of psychological distress compared to the control group (d = 1.41). Across the 3-month evaluation period, clinically significant change was exhibited by 50% of ACT participants, compared to 0% in the control group. When the control group received the same ACT intervention, 69% went on to exhibit clinically significant change. The ACT intervention also resulted in significant improvements in psychological flexibility, defusion, and mindfulness skills, but did not significantly reduce the frequency of negative cognitions. Bootstrapped mediation analyses indicated that the reduction in distress in the ACT condition was primarily associated with an increase in mindfulness skills, especially observing and non-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary support for providing brief ACT interventions as part of routine clinical support services for distressed workers. PRACTITIONER POINTS: A 1-day ACT workshop delivered in the context of a routine staff support service was effective for reducing psychological distress among health care workers. The brief nature of this group intervention means it may be particularly suitable for staff support and primary care mental health service settings. The findings indicate that the beneficial effects of an ACT workshop on distressed employees' mental health were linked to improvements in specific mindfulness skills. Study limitations include non-random allocation of participants to the ACT and control groups, and measurement of mediators and outcome at the same time point (3 months post-intervention).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjc.12155

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is the first study to show a significant improvement in psychological distress of NHS staff through an improvement of values (specifically values obstruction facet).

    “Although previous studies have found an indirect effect of mindfulness [29] or psychological flexibility [12, 75], to our knowledge, this is the first study to show a significant improvement in psychological distress of NHS staff through an improvement of values (specifically there was an influence on values obstruction facet).”

    From A workplace Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for improving healthcare staff psychological distress: A randomised controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The citation is attached to the statement that previous studies found an indirect effect through psychological flexibility, not to the citing authors’ claim about values obstruction. In the Results (pp. 15–16), this paper says only the mindfulness mediation model had statistically significant indirect effects; Table 4 (pp. 35–36) shows that the confidence interval for the psychological-flexibility indirect effect includes zero. The paper also states that it did not examine values-based behaviour (Limitations, p. 20). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study aimed to receive consent from up to 140 participants, anticipating approximately a 26% attrition rate.

    “However, based on the average drop-out rate reported in previous ACT interventions for HCPs [12, 24, 29], we aimed to receive consent from up to 140 participants, anticipating approximately a 26% attrition rate.”

    From A workplace Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for improving healthcare staff psychological distress: A randomised controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (Participant attrition, pp. 13–14) document drop-out in this ACT study of healthcare workers: 35 participants were allocated and 30 completed follow-up, about 14% attrition. The paper therefore contributes evidence of drop-out, but does not report a 26% rate; the target of 140 participants is the citing authors’ own plan, not a claim about this study. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding is consistent with the positive findings of ACT interventions for distress observed in a number of RCT studies in workplace contexts.

    “This finding is consistent with the positive findings of ACT interventions for distress observed in a number of RCT studies in workplace contexts [12, 15, 24, 29, 66, 67].”

    From A workplace Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for improving healthcare staff psychological distress: A randomised controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction (p. 7) reports that previous workplace ACT studies found improvements in employees’ mental health and that most previous evaluations were RCTs. But Waters’s own study used a quasi-controlled design with nonrandom allocation (p. 4), so it supports the statement about earlier RCT findings, not its inclusion as an RCT. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ACT has increasingly been found to be useful for employees with above average levels of psychological strain.

    “Because ACT has increasingly being found to be useful for employees with above average levels of psychological strain [19, 29, 30], we also aim to test whether initial level of strain moderates the effects.”
  • A study with 35 health care workers showed that 1-day ACT group workshops effectively reduced their psychological distress.

    “A study with 35 health care workers showed that 1-day ACT group workshops effectively reduced their psychological distress [15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 50

Authors
Waters, C. S., Frude, N., Flaxman, P. E., & Boyd, J.
Affiliations
  • Whitchurch Hospital (GB)
  • City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Waters, Cerith S.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-08-30
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
82-98
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2750837828
Cited by
50
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, healthcare workers, psychological distress, workplace mental health, brief group intervention, mindfulness skills, psychological flexibility, defusion, change processes, primary care mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Waiting Lists, Treatment Outcome, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review