Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis

Open access
Yosipovitch, G., Reaney, M., Mastey, V., Eckert, L., Abbé, A., Nelson, L., Clark, M., Williams, N., Chen, Z., Ardeleanu, M., Akinlade, B., Graham, N.M.H., Pirozzi, G., Staudinger, H., Plaum, S., Radin, A., Gadkari, A.·2019·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic disease characterized by intense, persistent and debilitating itch, resulting in sleep deprivation, signs of anxiety and depression, impaired quality of life and reduced productivity. The Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was developed and validated as a single-item, patient-reported outcome (PRO) of itch severity. OBJECTIVES: To describe the content validity and psychometric assessment (test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity, sensitivity to change) of the Peak Pruritus NRS, and to derive empirically a responder definition to identify adults with a meaningful change in itch. METHODS: Content validity was assessed through in-depth patient interviews. Psychometric assessments used data from phase IIb and phase III dupilumab clinical trials and included test-retest reliability, construct validity, known-groups validity and sensitivity to change in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. RESULTS: Interview participants indicated that the Peak Pruritus NRS was a relevant, clear and comprehensive assessment of itch severity. Peak Pruritus NRS scores showed large, positive correlations with existing PRO measures of itch, and weak or moderate correlations with clinician-reported measures assessing objective signs of AD. Peak Pruritus NRS score improvements were highly correlated with improvements in other itch PROs, and moderately correlated with improvements in clinician-reported measures assessing objective signs of AD. The most appropriate threshold for defining a clinically relevant, within-person response was ≥ 2-4-point change in the Peak Pruritus NRS. CONCLUSIONS: The Peak Pruritus NRS is a well-defined, reliable, sensitive and valid scale for evaluating worst itch intensity in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.17744

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Yosipovitch, G., Reaney, M., Mastey, V., Eckert, L., Abbé, A., Nelson, L., Clark, M., Williams, N., Chen, Z., Ardeleanu, M., Akinlade, B., Graham, N. M. H., Pirozzi, G., Staudinger, H., Plaum, S., Radin, A., & Gadkari, A.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2019-05
Volume
181
Issue
4
Pages
761-769
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2914603675
Cited by
394
References
32
FWCI
25.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.17744
The paper
Yosipovitch, G., Reaney, M., Mastey, V., Eckert, L., Abbé, A., Nelson, L., Clark, M., Williams, N., Chen, Z., Ardeleanu, M., Akinlade, B., Graham, N. M. H., Pirozzi, G., Staudinger, H., Plaum, S., Radin, A., & Gadkari, A. (2019). Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17744

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.