Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology

Rambe, Patient, Bere, Aaron·2013·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

One of the most complicated academic endeavours in transmission pedagogies is to generate democratic participation of all students and public expression of silenced voices. While the potential of mobile phones, particularly mobile instant messaging ( MIM ), to trigger broadened academic participation is increasingly acknowledged in literature, integrating MIM into classrooms and out‐of‐the‐classroom tasks has often been confronted with academic resistance. Academic uncertainty about MIM is often predicated on its perceived distractive nature and potential to trigger off‐task social behaviours. This paper argues that MIM has potential to create alternative dialogic spaces for student collaborative engagements in informal contexts, which can gainfully transform teaching and learning. An instance of a MIM , W hats A pp, was adopted for an information technology course at a S outh A frican university with a view to heighten lecturer–student and peer‐based participation, and enhance pedagogical delivery and inclusive learning in formal (lectures) and informal spaces. The findings suggest heightened student participation, the fostering of learning communities for knowledge creation and progressive shifts in the lecturer's mode of pedagogical delivery. However, the concomitant challenge of using MIM included mature adults' resentment of the merging of academic and family life occasioned by W hats A pp consultations after hours. Students also expressed ambivalence about MIM 's wide‐scale roll‐out in different academic programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12057

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1007/0-387-25588-5_15 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/027347539802000108 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y · DOI
  4. 10.4018/jmbl.2012040102 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cook J., 2008, Bridging the gap? Mobile phones at the interface between informal and formal learning, Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology (RCET), 4, 3
  7. 10.1108/02640470610660369 · DOI
  8. Dourando D. Parker M. B.&De la Harpe R.(2007).An investigation into the usage of mobile instant messaging in tertiary education.The 9th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications(pp.254–262) Johannesburg RSA.
  9. 10.1080/10494820903232943 · doi:10.1080/10494820903232943
  10. Farmer R.(2003).Instant messaging: collaborative tool or educator's nightmare!Retrieved April 28 2013 fromhttp://www.unb.ca/naweb/proceedings/2003/PaperFarmer.html
  11. Gee J. P., 2004, Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling
  12. 10.1080/10494820903356809 · DOI
  13. Jenkins H., 2010, Confronting the challenges of participatory cultures: media education for the 21 century
  14. Koole M., 2009, Mobile learning: transforming the delivery of education and training, 25
  15. Kreutzer T., 2009, Generation mobile: online and digital media usage on mobile phones among low‐income urban youth in South Africa
  16. Kukulska‐Hulme A., 2005, Mobile learning: a handbook for educators and trainers
  17. Lee M., 2010, Emerging technologies in distance education, 61, 10.15215/aupress/9781897425763.005 · doi:10.15215/aupress/9781897425763.005
  18. Livingston D., 2006, Learning in places: the informal education reader, 203
  19. 10.1080/08923648909526659 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ng'ambi D.(2011).Enhancing student interaction in didactic teaching approaches: the right to text during class. InProceedings of the 6th International Conference on e‐Learning(pp.249–257) University of British Columbia Kelowna 27–28 June 2011.
  21. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00276.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.4018/jmbl.2012040104 · DOI
  23. (Ed) Paper presented at Proceedings of the Southern African Computer Science Lecturers' Association Conference (SACLA) (pp.29-36) Thaba 'Nchu Bloemfontein 1-3 July 2012.
  24. Shneiderman B., 2005, Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human‐computer interaction
  25. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262113120.003.0010 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Vavoula G.(2004).KleOS: a knowledge and learning organisation system in support of lifelong learning. PhD Thesis. UK: University of Birmingham.
  27. 10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1078 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Vygotsky L., 1978, Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wisconsin Centre for Educational Research, 2011, Benefits and drawbacks of social media in education, WCER Highlights, 22, 1

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Rambe, P., & Bere, A.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-06-04
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
544-561
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W1933057298
Cited by
243
References
1
FWCI
37.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.