The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study
Abstract
Facebook is a popular social networking site. It, like many other new technologies, has potential for teaching and learning because of its unique built‐in functions that offer pedagogical, social and technological affordances. In this study, the Facebook group was used as a learning management system (LMS) in two courses for putting up announcements, sharing resources, organizing weekly tutorials and conducting online discussions at a teacher education institute in Singapore. This study explores using the Facebook group as an LMS and the students' perceptions of using it in their courses. Results showed that students were basically satisfied with the affordances of Facebook as the fundamental functions of an LMS could be easily implemented in the Facebook group. However, using the Facebook group as an LMS has certain limitations. It did not support other format files to be uploaded directly, and the discussion was not organized in a threaded structure. Also, the students did not feel safe and comfortable as their privacy might be revealed. Constraints of using the Facebook group as an LMS, implications for practice and limitations of this study are discussed. Practitioner notes: What is already known about this topic Facebook has been popularly used by tertiary students, but many students do not want their teachers to be friends on Facebook Teacher's self‐disclosure on Facebook can promote classroom atmosphere, teacher's credibility and student–teacher relationship Commercial learning management systems (LMSs) have limitations What this paper adds The Facebook group can be used an LMS as it has certain pedagogical, social and technological affordances Students are satisfied with the way of using the Facebook group as an LMS Younger students are more acceptable with the idea of using the Facebook group as an LMS Using the Facebook group as an LMS has limitations: it does not support other format files; its discussions are not listed in threads; and it is not perceived as a safe environment Implications for practice and/or policy The Facebook group can be used an LMS substitute or supplement Third‐party applications are needed to extend the capability of the Facebook group as an LMS Using Facebook seems to be more appropriate for young learners than adults Teachers do not have to be students' friends on Facebook.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
Facebook and academic performance
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 · Cited by 1,578 · cited 1×
“Kirschner and Karpinski (2010) compared the academic Using Facebook group as an LMS 3”
BackgroundRaacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 · Cited by 1,577 · cited 1×
“Social networking sites (SNSs) are virtual spaces where people of similar interest gather to communicate , share photos and discuss ideas with one another (Boyd & Ellison, 2008; Raacke & Bonds-Raacke, 2008).”
BackgroundMadge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439880902923606 · Cited by 1,157
Modeling educational usage of Facebook
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008 · Cited by 687
Cited by
WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students
Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education: Research · doi:10.28945/2051 · Cited by 659
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12007 · Cited by 413
Skues, J. L., Williams, B., & Wise, L. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.012 · Cited by 292
Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities
Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1078 · Cited by 253
Development of a problem-based learning model via a virtual learning environment
Phungsuk, R., Viriyavejakul, C., & Ratanaolarn, T. (2017) · Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2017.01.001 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 428-438
- ISSN
- 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8535
- OpenAlex
- W1700257412
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 114.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
- The paper
- Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.