Cited by 170Teaching and Learning ProgrammingChild Development and Digital TechnologyGender and Technology in Education

Computing education in children's early years: A call for debate

Open access
Manches, Andrew, Plowman, Lydia·2017·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

International changes in policy and curricula (notably recent developments in E ngland) have led to a focus on the role of computing education in the early years. As interest in the potential of computing education has increased, there has been a proliferation of programming tools designed for young children. While these changes are broadly to be welcomed, the pace of change has arguably led to more attention to the tools than to key questions about pedagogy. This paper proposes three areas of research (Logo; computational thinking; and teaching STEM subjects of science, technology, engineering and mathematics) that may inform computing education for young children and suggests that a greater focus on thinking skills and connections to manifestations of computers in the real world is needed. Above all, the paper calls for an informed debate about the trend towards introducing computing education to children in the early years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjet.12355

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown, N. C., Sentance, S., Crick, T., & Humphreys, S. (2014). Restart: The resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(2), 9.
  2. Compton, A., Glauert, E., Stylianido, F., Craft, A., Cremin, T., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2014). Creative Little Scientist: Set of Recommendations to Policy Makers and Stakeholders: Executive Summary. In s. Compton, E. Glauert, F. Stylianido, E. Agogi, Craft, T. Cremin, & S. Havu-Nuutinen (Eds.). Ellinogermaniki Agogi.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manches, A., & Plowman, L.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Manches, Andrew
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-13
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
191-201
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2100712682
Cited by
170
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K001531/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
computing education, early childhood education, young children, software development tools, logos, computational thinking, STEM education, pedagogy, curriculum policy, thinking skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review