Cited by 1,784Teaching and Learning ProgrammingDigital Education and SocietyDesign Education and Practice

Computational thinking and thinking about computing

Open access
Wing, Jeannette M·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Computational thinking will influence everyone in every field of endeavour. This vision poses a new educational challenge for our society, especially for our children. In thinking about computing, we need to be attuned to the three drivers of our field: science, technology and society. Accelerating technological advances and monumental societal demands force us to revisit the most basic scientific questions of computing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Abraham, D., Blum, A. & Sandholm, T. 2007 Clearing algorithms for barter exchange markets: enabling nationwide kidney exchanges. In Proc. 8th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pp. 295–304. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
  2. Adleman L.M. Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems Science 266 1994 1021 1024 10.1126/science.7973651 7973651 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Benenson Y. Gil B. Ben-Dor U. Adar R. Shapiro E. An autonomous molecular computer for logical control of gene expression Nature 429 2004 423 429 10.1038/nature02551 15116117 · DOI
  4. Fisher J. Henzinger T.A. Executable cell biology Nat. Biotechnol 25 2007 1239 1249 10.1038/nbt1356 17989686 · DOI
  5. Heller, M. J., Sullivan, B. & Dehling, D. 2005 Fabrication of photonic transfer DNA–quantum dot nanostructures. In Technical Proc. 2005 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Trade Show, vol. 1, ch. 12, pp. 769–772.
  6. Wing, J. M. 2006 Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 33–35.
  7. Wing J.M. Five deep questions in computing Commun. ACM 51 2008 58 60 10.1145/1327452.1327479 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wing, J. M.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Wing, Jeannette M
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2008-07-31
Volume
366
Issue
1881
Pages
3717-3725
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2165568289
Cited by
1,784
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 135 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 197 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 185 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Microsoft Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
computational thinking, computing education, science, technology and society, societal impact of computing, technological change
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Microcomputers, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Software, User-Computer Interface, Biomimetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review