The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: A systematic review of randomized trials
Abstract
Purpose: Psychological stress has been shown to delay wound healing. Several trials have investigated whether psychological interventions can improve wound healing, but to date, this evidence base has not been systematically synthesized. The objective was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in humans investigating whether psychological interventions can enhance wound healing. Methods: A systematic review was performed using Psych INFO , CINAHL , Web of Science, and MEDLINE . The searches included all papers published in English up until September 2016. The reference lists of relevant papers were screened manually to identify further review articles or relevant studies. Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Results: Fifteen of nineteen studies were of high methodological quality. Six studies were conducted with acute experimentally created wounds, five studies with surgical patients, two studies with burn wounds, two studies with fracture wounds, and four studies were conducted with ulcer wounds. Post‐intervention standardized mean differences ( SMD ) between groups across all intervention types ranged from 0.13 to 3.21, favouring improved healing, particularly for surgical patients and for relaxation interventions. However, there was some evidence for publication bias suggesting negative studies may not have been reported. Due to the heterogeneity of wound types, population types, and intervention types, it is difficult to pool effect sizes across studies. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that psychological interventions may aid wound healing. Although promising, more research is needed to assess the efficacy of each intervention on different wound types. Statement of contribution: What is already known on this subject? Psychological stress negatively affects wound healing. A number of studies have investigated whether psychological interventions can improve healing. However, no systematic reviews have been conducted. What does this study add? Synthesis and review of 19 trials conducted on psychological interventions and wound healing. Most evidence supports improved healing, particularly for surgical wounds and relaxation interventions. More research is needed on different intervention types with clinical wounds and into mechanisms of action.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chronic stress can impede wound healing, affecting recovery from plastic surgery and other invasive cosmetic procedures.
“Chronic stress can also impede wound healing, affecting recovery from plastic surgery and other invasive cosmetic procedures [59,60].”
From Regenerative and Protective Actions of the GHK-Cu Peptide in the Light of the New Gene Data (2018) · cites this paper as [59]
Cites
Factors affecting wound healing
Guo, S., & DiPietro, L. A. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359125 · Cited by 5,792 · see citing works
Emotions, morbidity, and mortality: new perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology.
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., McGuire, L., Robles, T. F., & Glaser, R. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135217 · Cited by 1,176 · see citing works
Life stress, mood disturbance, and elevated interleukin-6 in healthy older women
Lutgendorf, S. K., Garand, L., Buckwalter, K. C., Reimer, T. T., Hong, S.-Y., & Lubaroff, D. M. (1999) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/54.9.m434 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Dentino, A. N., Pieper, C. F., Rao, K. M. K., Currie, M. S., Harris, T., Blazer, D. G., & Cohen, H. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01894.x · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Pereira, L., Figueiredo-Braga, M., & Carvalho, I. P. (2016) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.016 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Curtis, K., Osadchuk, & Katz, J. (2011) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s22761 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Kekecs, Z., Nagy, T., & Varga, K. (2014) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000466 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regenerative and Protective Actions of the GHK-Cu Peptide in the Light of the New Gene Data
Pickart, L., & Margolina, A. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19071987 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robinson, H., Norton, S., Jarrett, P., & Broadbent, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Broadbent, Elizabeth
- Venue
- British Journal of Health Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 805-835
- ISSN
- 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2733863871
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Music Therapy and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Keywords
- psychological intervention, wound healing, psychological stress, relaxation intervention, surgical wounds, burn wounds
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Wound Healing, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review