Cited by 210COVID-19 and Mental HealthSocial impacts of COVID-19Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science

Open access
O'Connor, Daryl B., Aggleton, John P., Chakrabarti, Bhismadev, Cooper, Cary L., Creswell, Cathy, Dunsmuir, Sandra, Fiske, Susan T., Gathercole, Susan +21 more·2020·British Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus‐2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) that has caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic represents the greatest international biopsychosocial emergency the world has faced for a century, and psychological science has an integral role to offer in helping societies recover. The aim of this paper is to set out the shorter‐ and longer‐term priorities for research in psychological science that will (a) frame the breadth and scope of potential contributions from across the discipline; (b) enable researchers to focus their resources on gaps in knowledge; and (c) help funders and policymakers make informed decisions about future research priorities in order to best meet the needs of societies as they emerge from the acute phase of the pandemic. The research priorities were informed by an expert panel convened by the British Psychological Society that reflects the breadth of the discipline; a wider advisory panel with international input; and a survey of 539 psychological scientists conducted early in May 2020. The most pressing need is to research the negative biopsychosocial impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic to facilitate immediate and longer‐term recovery, not only in relation to mental health, but also in relation to behaviour change and adherence, work, education, children and families, physical health and the brain, and social cohesion and connectedness. We call on psychological scientists to work collaboratively with other scientists and stakeholders, establish consortia, and develop innovative research methods while maintaining high‐quality, open, and rigorous research standards.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjop.12468

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 59 · Cited by 210

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ahmad, I., & Rathore, F. A. (2020). Neurological manifestations and complications of COVID‐19: A literature review. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 77, 8– 12. 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.05.017 32409215 PMC7200361 · DOI
  2. Armitage, C. J. (2015). Changing behaviour, slow and fast: Commentary on Peters, de Bruin and Crutzen. Health Psychology Review, 9(1), 30– 33. 10.1080/17437199.2014.912537 25793488 · DOI
  3. Banholzer, S., Kossin, J., & Donner, S. (2014). The impact of climate change on natural disasters. In A. Singh & Z. Zommers (Eds.), Reducing disaster: Early warning systems for climate change (pp. 21– 49). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, Netherlands.
  4. Bartholomew Eldrigde, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernàndez, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An Intervention Mapping approach (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self‐regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 1– 15. 10.1207/s15327965pli0701_1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2019). Systematically reviewing remote e‐workers' well‐being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51– 73. 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dar, I. A., & Iqbal, N. (2020). Beyond linear evidence: The curvilinear relationship between secondary traumatic stress and vicarious posttraumatic growth among healthcare professionals. Stress and Health, 36, 203– 212. 10.1002/smi.2932 31994272 · DOI
  8. Drury, J. (2018). The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review. European Review of Social Psychology, 29(1), 38– 81. 10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Epton, T., Currie, S., & Armitage, C. J. (2017). Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 85, 1182– 1198. 10.1037/ccp0000260 29189034 · DOI
  10. Erola, J., Janolen, S., & Lehti, H. (2016). Parental education, class and income over early life course and children's achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 33– 43. 10.1016/j.rssm.2016.01.003 · DOI
  11. Fasey, K. J., Sarkar, M., Wagstaff, C. R. D., & Johnston, J. (under review). Defining and characterising organisational resilience in elite sport.
  12. Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Dino, R. N. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face‐to‐face, or having access to communication‐enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1412– 1421. 10.1037/a0012722 19025257 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Greenberg, N., Docherty, M., Gnanapragasam, S., & Wessely, S. (2020). Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid‐19 pandemic. BMJ, 368, M1211. 32217624
  14. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning, a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
  15. Hoffart, A., Johnson, S. U., & Ebrahimi, O. V. (2020, June 6). Loneliness and social distancing during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Risk factors and associations with psychopathology. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/j9e4q. 10.31234/osf.io/j9e4q PMC7714714 33329136 · DOI
  16. Itzhaki, M., Bluvstein, I., Peles Bortz, A., Kostistky, H., Bar Noy, D., Filshtinsky, V., & Theilla, M. (2018). Mental health nurse’s exposure to workplace violence leads to job stress, which leads to reduced professional quality of life. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 59. 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00059 29535652 PMC5835109 · DOI
  17. Jaume, D., & Willén, A. (2019). The long‐run effects of teacher strikes: Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Labor Economics, 37, 1097– 1139. 10.1086/703134 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keyworth, C., Epton, T., Goldthorpe, J., Calam, R., & Armitage, C. J. (2020). Delivering opportunistic behavior change interventions: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Prevention Science, 21, 319– 331. 10.1007/s11121-020-01087-6 32067156 PMC7056685 · DOI
  19. Layard, R., Clark, A. E., Cornaglia, F., Powdthavee, N., & Vernoit, J. (2014). What predicts a successful life? A life‐course model of well‐being. The Economic Journal, 124, F720– F738. 10.1111/ecoj.12170 25422527 PMC4240315 · DOI
  20. Mark, G. J., Iqbal, S. T., Czerwinski, M., Johns, P., Sano, A., & Lutchyn, Y. (2016). Email duration, batching and self‐interruption: Patterns of email use on productivity and stress. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1717– 1728. 10.1145/2858036.2858262 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Masten, A. S., & Osofsky, J. D. (2010). Disasters and their impact on child development: Introduction to the special section. Child Development, 81, 1029– 1039. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01452.x 20636680 · DOI
  22. McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38, 655– 662. 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x 26846316 PMC4909789 · DOI
  23. Merry, A. F., Cooper, J. B., Soyannwo, O., Wilson, I. H., & Eichhorn, J. H. (2010). An iterative process of global quality improvement: The International Standards for a Safe Practice of Anesthesia 2010. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia‐Journal Canadien d'anesthesie, 57, 1021– 1026. 10.1007/s12630-010-9380-7 PMC2957571 20857255 · DOI
  24. Needham, E. J., Chou, S.H‐Y., Coles, A. J., & Menon, D. K. (2020). Neurological implications of COVID‐19 infections. Neurocritical Care, 32, 667– 671. 10.1007/s12028-020-00978-4 32346843 PMC7188454 · DOI
  25. Norris, E., & O'Connor, D. B. (2019). Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of Open Science. Psychology and Health, 34, 1397– 1406. 10.1080/08870446.2019.1679373 31661325 · DOI
  26. Power, N. (2018). Extreme teams: Toward a greater understanding of multiagency teamwork during major emergencies and disasters. American Psychologist, 73, 478– 490. 10.1037/amp0000248 29792462 · DOI
  27. Rogers, J. P., Chesney, E., Oliver, D., Pollak, T. A., McGuire, P., Fusar‐Poli, P., … David, A. S. (2020). Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with comparison to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 611– 627. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0 32437679 PMC7234781 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rubin, G. J., Potts, H. W. W., & Michie, S. (2010). The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technology Assessment, 14, 183– 266. 20630124
  29. Sauter, M., Draschkow, D., & Mack, W. (2020). Building, hosting and recruiting: A brief introduction to running behavioral experiments online. Brain Sciences, 10, 251. 10.3390/brainsci10040251 PMC7226161 32344671 · DOI
  30. Sawalha, A. H., Zhao, M., Coit, P., & Lu, Q. (2020). Epigenetic dysregulation of ACE2 and interferon‐regulated genes might suggest increased COVID‐19 susceptibility and severity in lupus patients. Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.), 215, 108410. 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108410 PMC7139239 32276140 · DOI
  31. Smith, N., Kinnafick, F., & Saunders, B. (2017). Coping strategies used during an extreme antarctic expedition. Journal of Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 13(1), Article 1. 10.7771/2327-2937.1078 · DOI
  32. South, A. M., Diz, D. I., & Chappell, M. C. (2020). COVID‐19, ACE2, and the cardiovascular consequences. American Journal of Physiology‐Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 318, H1084– H1090. 32228252 PMC7191628
  33. Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England post‐2010. (2010). Fair society, healthier lives: The Marmot review. (n.p.): The Marmot Review.
  34. Sunderman, G. L., & Payne, A. (2009). Does closing schools cause educational harm? A review of the research. information brief. Arlington, VA: Mid‐Atlantic Equity Commission.
  35. Taylor, C., Dollard, M. F., Clark, A., Dormann, C., & Bakker, A. B. (2019). Psychosocial safety climate as a factor in organisational resilience: Implications for worker psychological health, resilience, and engagement. In M. Dollard, C. Dormann, & M. Awang Idirs (Eds.), Psychosocial safety climate (pp. 199– 228). Springer.
  36. Wu, P., Fang, Y., Guan, Z., Fan, B., Kong, J., Yao, Z., … Hoven, C. W. (2009). The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: Exposure, risk perfection, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 302– 311. 19497162 PMC3780353
  37. Zeegers, M. A. J., Colonnesi, C., Stams, G.‐J.‐ J.‐ M., & Meins, E. (2017). Mind matters: A three‐level meta‐analysis on parental mentalization and sensitivity as predictors of infant–parent attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1245– 1272. 10.1037/bul0000114 28805399 · DOI

Authors
O'Connor, D. B., Aggleton, J. P., Chakrabarti, B., Cooper, C. L., Creswell, C., Dunsmuir, S., Fiske, S. T., Gathercole, S., Gough, B., Ireland, J. L., Jones, M. V., Jowett, A., Kagan, C., Karanika‐Murray, M., Kaye, L. K., Kumari, V., Lewandowsky, S., Lightman, S., Malpass, D., Meins, E., Morgan, B. P., Morrison Coulthard, L. J., Reicher, S. D., Schacter, D. L., Sherman, S. M., Simms, V., Williams, A., Wykes, T., & Armitage, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • Edge Hill University (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • British Psychological Society (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • British Psychological Society Leicester UK
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Keele University (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
O'Connor, Daryl B.
Venue
British Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-19
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
603-629
ISSN
  • 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8295
OpenAlex
W3038946213
Cited by
210
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 16
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (217065/Z/19/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP_2014-04-018, NF-SI-0514-10028, NIHR201370)
  • NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
  • Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
  • Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_19009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Social impacts of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, research priorities, biopsychosocial impact, mental health, behavior change, adherence, work, children and families, physical health, brain, social cohesion, connectedness, post-pandemic recovery, research funding, interdisciplinary collaboration
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Psychology, Research Design, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review