Rational bystanders
Abstract
The bystander effect, the phenomenon that the (real or imagined) presence of others inhibits helping, has often been ascribed to bystanders’ apathy. In the present research, we demonstrate that the occurrence of the bystander effect has rational roots. Three studies reveal that the presence of other bystanders does not inhibit helping when effective helping requires more than one help‐giver. Mediation analyses showed that the bystander effect did not occur when many responses were needed because bystanders did not shift responsibility to others when in the presence of other bystanders. These findings suggest that the rational considerations underlying the bystander effect can mitigate the effects of the presence of other bystanders on helping behaviour when more than one help‐giver is needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.
Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025589 · Cited by 3,083 · see citing works
(1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,372 · see citing works
Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023304 · Cited by 983 · see citing works
Self-citationDispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects.
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Ten years of research on group size and helping.
Latané, B., & Nida, S. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.2.308 · Cited by 749 · cited 4× · see citing works
“An online context constitutes a form of restricted communication (Stalder, 2008) where diffusion of responsibility – but not audience inhibition and social influence – underlies the bystander effect (Latan e & Nida, 1981).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMotivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis.
Kerr, N. L. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.819 · Cited by 669 · see citing works
Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis.
Shepperd, J. A. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.67 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect.
Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Levine, M., & Crowther, S. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012634 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses.
Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. F. (2007) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.62.6.555 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Electronic Helping Behavior: The Virtual Presence of Others Makes a Difference
Blair, C. A., Thompson, L. F., & Wuensch, K. L. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2702_8 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A Rational Reconstruction of Misbehavior
Krueger, J. I., & Massey, A. L. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.786 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Fischer, P. A., & Greitemeyer, T. (2012) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.697931 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Effect of the Number of People Present in a Nonemergency Situation
Hurley, D., & Allen, B. P. (1974) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923068 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Revisiting the issue of safety in numbers: The likelihood of receiving help from a group
Stalder, D. R. (2008) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510701766181 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D.
- Affiliations
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Greitemeyer, Tobias
- ORCID
- Greitemeyer, Tobias
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-19
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 773-780
- ISSN
- 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8309
- OpenAlex
- W4235522650
- Semantic Scholar
- 51e842eb4eede461c533f15d3ba4eae66558e709
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- bystander effect, helping behavior, diffusion of responsibility, rational decision-making, presence of others, apathy, group decision making
- MeSH terms
- Female, Group Processes, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rationalization, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
