Cited by 72Social and Intergroup PsychologyGender, Feminism, and MediaPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Tweeting about sexism: The well‐being benefits of a social media collective action

Foster, Mindi D.·2015·British Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

Although collective action has psychological benefits in non‐gendered contexts ( D rury et al ., 2005, B r . J . S oc . P sychol ., 44, 309), the benefits for women taking action against gender discrimination are unclear. This study examined how a popular, yet unexplored potential form of collective action, namely tweeting about sexism, affects women's well‐being. Women read about sexism and were randomly assigned to tweet or to one of three control groups. Content analyses showed tweets exhibited collective intent and action. Analyses of linguistic markers suggested public tweeters used more cognitive complexity in their language than private tweeters. Profile analyses showed that compared to controls, only public tweeters showed decreasing negative affect and increasing psychological well‐being, suggesting tweeting about sexism may serve as a collective action that can enhance women's well‐being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjso.12101

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, M. D.
Affiliations
Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Corresponding author
Foster, Mindi D.
Venue
British Journal of Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-30
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
629-647
ISSN
  • 0144-6665 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8309
OpenAlex
W2078118675
Cited by
72
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (410‐2005‐0256)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
sexism, collective action, social media, Twitter, women's well-being, gender discrimination, negative affect, linguistic complexity, digital activism
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Affect, Female, Humans, Social Behavior, Young Adult, Social Media, Sexism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review