Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Pathology of an Autoimmune Astrocytopathy: Lessons Learned from Neuromyelitis Optica

Open access
Lucchinetti, Claudia F., Guo, Yong, Popescu, Bogdan F. Gh., Fujihara, Kazuo, Itoyama, Yasuto, Misu, Tatsuro·2014·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a disabling autoimmune astrocytopathy characterized by typically severe and recurrent attacks of optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive myelitis. Until recently, NMO was considered an acute aggressive variant of multiple sclerosis (MS), despite the fact that early studies postulated that NMO and MS may be two distinct diseases with a common clinical picture. With the discovery of a highly specific serum autoantibody (NMO‐IgG), Lennon and colleagues provided the first unequivocal evidence distinguishing NMO from MS and other central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory demyelinating disorders. The target antigen of NMO‐IgG was confirmed to be aquaporin‐4 (AQP4), the most abundant water channel protein in the CNS, mainly expressed on astrocytic foot processes at the blood–brain barrier, subpial and subependymal regions. Pathological studies demonstrated that astrocytes were selectively targeted in NMO as evidenced by the extensive loss of immunoreactivities for the astrocytic proteins, AQP4 and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), as well as perivascular deposition of immunoglobulins and activation of complement even within lesions with a relative preservation of myelin. In support of these pathological findings, GFAP levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during acute NMO exacerbations were found to be remarkably elevated in contrast to MS where CSF‐GFAP levels did not substantially differ from controls. Additionally, recent experimental studies showed that AQP4 antibody is pathogenic, resulting in selective astrocyte destruction and dysfunction in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. These findings strongly suggest that NMO is an autoimmune astrocytopathy where damage to astrocytes exceeds both myelin and neuronal damage. This chapter will review recent neuropathological studies that have provided novel insights into the pathogenic mechanisms, cellular targets, as well as the spectrum of tissue damage in NMO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bpa.12099

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Lucchinetti, C. F., Guo, Y., Popescu, B. F. G., Fujihara, K., Itoyama, Y., & Misu, T.
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-18
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
83-97
ISSN
  • 1015-6305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3639
OpenAlex
W2119987649
Cited by
414
References
104
FWCI
15.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pathology of an Autoimmune Astrocytopathy: Lessons Learned from Neuromyelitis Optica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bpa.12099
The paper
Lucchinetti, C. F., Guo, Y., Popescu, B. F. G., Fujihara, K., Itoyama, Y., & Misu, T. (2014). The Pathology of an Autoimmune Astrocytopathy: Lessons Learned from Neuromyelitis Optica. Brain Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.