The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the spectrum of neuromyelitis optica (NMO), including characteristics of the index events (optic neuritis [ON]) and myelitis), neuroimaging, CSF, and serologic studies, and to evaluate the long-term course. METHODS: Review of 71 patients with NMO evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1950 and 1997. RESULTS: NMO was either monophasic or relapsing. Patients with a monophasic course (n = 23) usually presented with rapidly sequential index events (median 5 days) with moderate recovery. Most with a relapsing course (n = 48) had an extended interval between index events (median 166 days) followed within 3 years by clusters of severe relapses isolated to the optic nerves and spinal cord. Most relapsing patients developed severe disability in a stepwise manner, and one-third died because of respiratory failure. Features of NMO distinct from "typical" MS included >50 cells/mm3 in CSF (often polymorphonuclear), normal initial brain MRI, and lesions extending over three or more vertebral segments on spinal cord MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features generally distinguish neuromyelitis optica from MS. Patients with relapsing optic neuritis and myelitis may have neuromyelitis optica rather than MS. Patients with a relapsing course of neuromyelitis optica have a poor prognosis and frequently develop respiratory failure during attacks of cervical myelitis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McDonald, W. I., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H., Lublin, F. D., McFarland, H. F., Paty, D. W., Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., et al. (2001) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.1032 · Cited by 6,969
Self-citationDiagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Edan, G., Filippi, M., Hartung, H., Kappos, L., Lublin, F. D., Metz, L. M., McFarland, H. F., O'Connor, P. W., et al. (2005) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20703 · Cited by 5,017
Self-citationInternational consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
Wingerchuk, D. M., Banwell, B., Bennett, J. L., Cabre, P., Carroll, W., Chitnis, T., de Seze, J., Fujihara, K., Greenberg, B., Jacob, A., et al. (2015) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000001729 · Cited by 4,649
Self-citationA serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis
Lennon, V. A., Wingerchuk, D. M., Kryzer, T. J., Pittock, S. J., Lucchinetti, C. F., Fujihara, K., Nakashima, I., & Weinshenker, B. G. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17551-x · Cited by 3,239
Self-citationIgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel
Lennon, V. A., Kryzer, T. J., Pittock, S. J., Verkman, A. S., & Hinson, S. R. (2005) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20050304 · Cited by 2,288
Metadata
- Authors
- Wingerchuk, D. M., Hogancamp, W. F., O’Brien, P. C., & Weinshenker, B. G.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1107-1107
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2053472907
- Cited by
- 1,822
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1107
- The paper
- Wingerchuk, D. M., Hogancamp, W. F., O’Brien, P. C., & Weinshenker, B. G. (1999). The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.5.1107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.