Cited by 245Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Altered Machinery of Protein Synthesis in Alzheimer's: From the Nucleolus to the Ribosome

Open access
Hernández‐Ortega, Karina, Garcia‐Esparcia, Paula, Gil, Laura, Lucas, José J., Ferrer, Isidre·2016·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Ribosomes and protein synthesis have been reported to be altered in the cerebral cortex at advanced stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Modifications in the hippocampus with disease progression have not been assessed. Sixty‐seven cases including middle‐aged (MA) and AD stages I–VI were analyzed. Nucleolar chaperones nucleolin, nucleophosmin and nucleoplasmin 3, and upstream binding transcription factor RNA polymerase I gene ( UBTF ) mRNAs are abnormally regulated and their protein levels reduced in AD. Histone modifications dimethylated histone H3K9 (H3K9me2) and acetylated histone H3K12 (H3K12ac) are decreased in CA1. Nuclear tau declines in CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG), and practically disappears in neurons with neurofibrillary tangles. Subunit 28 ribosomal RNA (28S rRNA) expression is altered in CA1 and DG in AD. Several genes encoding ribosomal proteins are abnormally regulated and protein levels of translation initiation factors eIF2α, eIF3η and eIF5, and elongation factor eEF2, are altered in the CA1 region in AD. These findings show alterations in the protein synthesis machinery in AD involving the nucleolus, nucleus and ribosomes in the hippocampus in AD some of them starting at first stages (I–II) preceding neuron loss. These changes may lie behind reduced numbers of dendritic branches and reduced synapses of CA1 and DG neurons which cause hippocampal atrophy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study analyzed 67 cases including middle-aged (MA) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) stages I–VI and reports altered protein synthesis machinery from nucleolus to ribosome in the hippocampus. Some changes appear at stages I–II, before neuron loss, and may contribute to reduced dendritic branches, synapse loss, and hippocampal atrophy.

Key findings

  • Nucleolar chaperones NCL, NPM1, NPM3 and UBTF mRNAs are abnormally regulated and their protein levels reduced in AD. In CA1, UBTF mRNA is down-regulated at stages I–II, III–IV and V–VI; NPM1 is up-regulated at I–II and III–IV but normal at V–VI; NPM3 is up-regulated at III–IV and down-regulated at V–VI. In DG, NPM1, NPM3 and UBTF mRNAs are reduced at V–VI. Immunoreactivity for NPM1, NPM3, NCL and UBF decreases in CA1 and DG with disease progression.
  • Histone modifications H3K9me2 and H4K12ac decline in CA1 and DG neurons with AD progression. Nuclear tau-100 immunoreactivity decreases in CA1 and DG and practically disappears in neurons with neurofibrillary tangles.
  • 28S rRNA is altered: in CA1 it is down-regulated at AD I–II and III–IV but up-regulated at V–VI; in DG it is transiently down-regulated at III–IV. 18S rRNA is not significantly altered in either region.
  • Ribosomal protein mRNAs are altered: 11 of 16 examined in CA1 and 9 of 16 in DG at stage V–VI. Some changes occur at I–II, including down-regulation of RPL23A, RPL26, RPL31, RPS5, RPS6, RPS10 and RPS13 in DG, and up-regulation of RPL5/RPL26 with down-regulation of RPS5/RPS6 in CA1. In CA1, eIF2α protein increases at III–IV and V–VI, eIF3η decreases at the same stages, eIF5 is slightly reduced only at III–IV, eEF2 is reduced only at I–II, and eEF1A is unchanged.

Methods

  • Post-mortem brain samples from 67 cases: 18 MA and AD cases at Braak stages I–II (n = 16), III–IV (n = 16) and V–VI (n = 17). CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) were examined in parallel; AD diagnosis followed Braak and Braak staging.
  • TaqMan PCR measured mRNAs for nucleolar genes, rRNA and ribosomal proteins; immunohistochemistry and cell counting assessed nucleolar proteins, histones and nuclear tau; Western blotting in CA1 assessed initiation factors eIF2α, eIF3η, eIF5 and elongation factors eEF1A, eEF2.
  • Statistical analyses used Student t-test for TaqMan data and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for cell counting and Western blotting, with significance at *P < 0.05, P < 0.01, *P < 0.001.

Limitations

  • The paper states that none of the alterations proves protein synthesis is impaired; attempts to measure protein synthesis by labeled amino acid incorporation in post-mortem human brain were unsuccessful due to very low and erratic S35 methionine incorporation. The small size of the DG prevented use of frozen samples for protein studies of translation factors.
  • The paper notes that regional vulnerability differences between CA1 and DG remain unresolved.
  • Evident from the text: findings rely on post-mortem human tissue, some assays used subsets of cases (TaqMan PCR: 14 controls and 28 AD cases; cell counting: four to six cases per group), and mRNA and protein levels did not always match, which the authors suggest may involve epigenetic factors and non-coding RNAs.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bpa.12335

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 69 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Decreased eIF3η protein expression occurs in CA1 at AD stages III-IV and V-VI.

    “whereas decreased expression of eIF3η occurred in parallel at the same stages of AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    In the CA1 region of AD cases at stages III-IV, NPM3 mRNA is up-regulated compared with MA.

    “In addition, NPM3 mRNA was up‐regulated at stages III–IV (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    In CA1, 18S rRNA is not modified at any AD stage.

    “Regarding CA1, no modifications in 18S rRNA expression levels were found at any stage”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    No immunohistochemical differences in NPM1, NPM3, NCL, and UBF are seen between MA and AD stages I-II in DG and CA1.

    “Importantly, no immunohischemical differences regarding NPM1, NPM3, NCL and UBF were seen between MA individuals and AD cases at stages I–II in DG and CA1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Nuclear tau-100 immunoreactivity decreases in CA1, DG, hilus, entorhinal cortex, and temporal cortex with AD progression.

    “Decreased tau‐100 nuclear immunoreactivity was observed in all these regions in AD with disease progression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 26
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 17
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    In CA1, RPL5 and RPL26 mRNAs are up-regulated and RPS5 and RPS26 mRNAs down-regulated in AD I-II compared with MA.

    “Regarding CA1, RPL5 and RPL26 mRNAs were up‐regulated and RPS5 and RPS26 mRNAs down‐regulated in AD I‐II in relation to MA cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    mRNA levels of several ribosomal proteins are down-regulated in the DG in AD I-II, III-IV, and V-VI, with some up-regulation at V-VI.

    “mRNA levels of RPL23A, RPL26, RPL31, RPS5, RPS6, RPS10 and RPS13 were down‐regulated in the DG in AD I–II compared with MA; and mRNAs of RPL21, RPL23A, RPL27, RPS5, RPS6, RPS10, and RPS13 in AD III–IV in comparison with MA.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “RPL7, RPL21, RPL26, RPL27, RPL31, RPS10, RPS16 and RPS17 mRNA levels were significantly down‐regulated and RPL22 up‐regulated in DG at stages V–VI when compared with MA cases”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    In the CA1 region of AD cases at stages I-II and III-IV, NPM1 mRNA is up-regulated and UBTF mRNA is down-regulated compared with MA.

    “Regarding the CA1 region, NPM1 up‐regulation and UBTF down‐regulation were observed in AD at stages I–II and III–IV when compared with MA cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    UBF immunoreactivity decreases in nucleolus and diffuse nucleus with AD progression, and UBF translocates to cytoplasm and integrates into NFTs but not dystrophic neurites of senile plaques.

    “Nucleolar and diffuse nuclear UBF immunoreactivity decreased with AD progression (Figure 2E–L). In addition, UBF immunoreactivity translocated to the cytoplasm and was integrated into NFTs but not in dystrophic neurites of senile plaques”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    28S rRNA is reduced in CA1 in AD I-II and III-IV but up-regulated at AD V-VI compared with MA.

    “28S rRNA was reduced in AD I–II and AD III–IV but it was found to be up‐regulated at AD stages V–VI compared with MA (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Reduced numbers of nucleoli (Nissl) and NPM1, NPM3, NCL, UBF-immunoreactive nucleoli are observed in CA1 at stages III-IV and more markedly at V-VI, with a similar but less severe pattern in DG.

    “reduced numbers of nucleoli, as revealed with Nissl stain, and reduced numbers of NPM1, NPM3, NCL and UBF‐immunoreactive nucleoli was observed in CA1 at stages III–IV, and more markedly at stages V–VI (Table 2). A similar pattern, although less severe, was seen in DG”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    NCL nucleolar immunostaining decreases in CA1 neurons with AD progression, and NCL localizes in cytoplasmic granules recognized as granulovacuolar degeneration in CA1 neurons at advanced AD stages.

    “Decreased nucleolar immunostaining in CA1 neurons with disease progression was also observed for NCL. Curiously, NCL was localized in cytoplasmic granules recognized as granulovacuolar degeneration in CA1 neurons at advanced stages of AD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    In the CA1 region of AD cases at stages V-VI, NCL, NPM3, and UBTF mRNAs are reduced, while NPM1 mRNA levels are normal compared with MA.

    “This was followed by significantly reduced expression of NCL, NPM3 and UBTF mRNAs, and normal NPM1 mRNA levels at stages V–VI (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    Reduced eEF2 protein levels are identified in CA1 only at AD stages I-II and normalize thereafter.

    “Reduced eEF2 protein levels were identified only at stages I–II and normalized thereafter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    In CA1, RPL5 mRNA is up-regulated and RPL23A and RPS5 down-regulated at AD stages III-IV compared with MA.

    “RPL5 mRNA was up‐regulated and RPL23A and RPS5 down‐regulated at stages II–IV.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    In CA1, RPL5 and RPL30 mRNAs are up-regulated at AD stages V-VI, but RPL21, RPL23A, RPL26, RPL31, RPS6, RPS10, RPS13, RPS16 and RPS17 are significantly down-regulated compared with MA.

    “RPL5 and RPL30 mRNAs were up‐regulated at stages V–VI, but RPL21, RPL23A, RPL26, RPL31, RPS6, RPS10, RPS13, RPS16 and RPS17 significantly down‐regulated at stages V–VI (Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    The expression of NPM1 and UBTF mRNAs, 28sRNA, RPL5, RPL26, RPS5 and RPS6 mRNAs, and eEF2 protein is altered in the CA1 at stages I-II of Braak and Braak.

    “the expression of NPM1 and UBTF mRNAs, 28sRNA, RPL5, RPL26, RPS5 and RPS6 mRNAs, and eEF2 protein is altered in the CA1 at stages I–II of Braak and Braak.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Altered expression of nucleolar chaperones and factors involved in rRNA synthesis results in nucleolar stress which in turn leads to impaired ribosomal biogenesis.

    “It is known that altered expression of nucleolar chaperones and factors involved in rRNA synthesis results in nucleolar stress which in turn leads to impaired ribosomal biogenesis 4, 58, 69, 79.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [4] 4. Avitabile D, Bailey B, Cottage CT, Sundararaman B, Joyo A, McGregor M et al (2011) Nucleolar stress is an early response to myocardial damage involving nucleolar proteins nucleostemin and nucleophosmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:6145–6150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [58] 58. Kiryk A, Sowodniok K, Kreiner G, Rodriguez‐Parkitna J, Sönmez A, Górkiewicz T et al (2013) Impaired rRNA synthesis triggers homeostatic responses in hippocampal neurons. Front Cell Neurosci 7:207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [69] 69. McKeown PC, Shaw PJ (2009) Chromatin: linking structure and function in the nucleolus. Chromosoma 118:11–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [79] 79. Parlato R, Kreiner G (2013) Nucleolar activity in neurodegenerative diseases: a missing piece of the puzzle? J Mol Med 91:541–547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    UBF encoded by UBTF is associated with NOR and is required for rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase 1.

    “UBF encoded by UBTF (upstream binding transcription factor, RNA polymerase I gene) is associated with NOR and is required for rDNA transcription by RNA polymerase 1 83.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [83] 83. Roussel P, André C, Masson C, Géraud G, Hernandez‐Verdun D (1993) Localization of the RNA polymerase I transcription factor hUBF during the cell cycle. J Cell Sci 104:327–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    Immunohistochemistry shows reduced immunoreactivity in remaining nucleoli at middle and advanced stages of the disease, suggesting declining immunoreactivity in surviving cells.

    “In addition, immunohistochemistry shows reduced immunoreactivity in remaining nucleoli at middle and advanced stages of the disease thus suggesting declining immunoreactivity in surviving cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    NCL, NPM1/B23 and NPM3 are major nucleolar proteins acting as histone-binding chaperones required for chromatin compacting and regulation of rRNA transcription.

    “NCL, NPM1/B23 and NPM3 are major nucleolar proteins acting as histone‐binding chaperones required for chromatin compacting and regulation of rRNA transcription 2, 18, 33, 37, 40, 41, 53, 65, 72, 74, 77, 97, 102, 104.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 10 sources checked
    • cites [2] 2. Angelov D, Bondarenko VA, Almagro S, Menoni H, Mongelard F, Hans F et al (2006) Nucleolin is a histone chaperone with FACT like activity and assists remodeling of nucleosomes. EMBO J 25:1669–1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] 18. Cong R, Das S, Ugrinova I, Kumar S, Mongerlard F, Wong J, Bouvet P (2012) Interaction of nucleolin with ribosomal RNA genes and its role in RNA polymerase I transcription. Nucleic Acids Res 40:9441–9454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] 33. Erard MS, Belenguer P, Caizergues‐Ferrer M, Pantaloni A, Amalric F (1988) A major nucleolar protein, nucleolin, induces chromatin decondensation by binding to histone H1. Eur J Biochem 175:525–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] 37. Frehlick LJ, Eirín‐López JM, Ausio J (2007) New insights into the nucleophosmin/nucleoplasmin family of nuclear chaperones. Bioassays 29:49–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] 40. Gadad SS, Shandilya J, Kishore AH, Kundu TK (2010) NPM3, a member of the nucleoiphosmin/nucleoplasmin family, enhances activator‐dependent transcription. Biochemistry 49:1355–1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] 41. Ginisty H, Sicard H, Roger B, Bouvet P (1999) Structure and functions of nucleolin. J Cell Sci 112:761–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [53] 53. Huang N, Negi S, Szebeni A, Olson MOJ (2005) Protein NPM3 interacts with the multifunctional nucleolar protein B23/nucleophosmin and inhibits ribosome biogenesis. J Biol Chem 280:5496–5502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [65] 65. Lindström MS (2011) NPM1/B23: a multifunctional chaperone in ribosome biogenesis and chromatin remodeling. Biochem Res Int 2011: 195209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] 72. Motoi N, Suzuki K, Hirota R Johnson P, Oofusa K, Kikuchi Y, Yoshizato K (2008) Identification and characterization of nucleoplasmin 3 as a histone‐binding protein in embryonic stem cells. Dev Growth Diff 50:307–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [74] 74. Namboodiri VMH, Akey IV, Schmidt‐Zachmann MS, Head JF, Akey CW (2004) The structure and function of Xenopus NO38‐core, a histone chaperone in the nucleolus. Structure 12:2149–2160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    Densitometric protein values were normalized with β-actin levels and expressed as an optical density ratio.

    “Densitometric protein values were normalized with β‐actin levels and expressed as an optical density ratio.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction

    The nuclear organizer region (NOR) surface/total nucleus surface is reduced and the rDNA promoter is hyper-methylated in AD, suggesting epigenetic silencing of rDNA at very precise times of AD progression.

    “Moreover, the nuclear organizer region (NOR) surface/total nucleus surface is reduced 22, 28, and the rDNA promoter is hyper‐methylated in AD, thus suggesting epigenetic silencing of rDNA at very precise times of AD progression 80.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] 22. da Silva AM, Payão SL, Borsatto B, Bertolucci PH, Smith MA (2000) Quantitative evaluation of rRNA in Alzheimer's disease. Mech Ageing Dev 120:57–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [28] 28. Dönmez‐Altuntas H, Akalain H, Karaman Y, Demirtas H, Imamoglu N, Ozkul Y (2005) Evaluation of the nucleolar organizer regions in Alzheimer's disease. Gerontology 51:297–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [80] 80. Pietrzak M, Rempala G, Nelson PT, Zheng JJ, Hetman M (2011) Epigenetic silencing of nucleolar rRNA genes in Alzheimer's disease PLoS One 6:e22585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    Brain samples were obtained following European Union legislation and approval of the local ethics committee.

    “Brain samples were obtained from the Institute of Neuropathology HUB‐ICO‐IDIBELL Biobank following European Union legislation and the approval of the local ethics committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    MA cases had not suffered from neurologic or psychiatric diseases and did not have lesions in the neuropathological study.

    “MA cases (n = 18) had not suffered from neurologic or psychiatric diseases, and did not have lesions in the neuropathological study (including vascular, hypoxic, and inflammatory).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Introduction

    To test specificity of immunoreaction, some sections were incubated without primary antibodies; the staining was negative.

    “To test the specificity of immunoreaction some sections were incubated without the primary antibodies; the staining was negative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    Parallel assays for each sample were performed using TaqMan probes for β-glucuronidase (GUS-β) and X-prolyl aminopepidase P1 (XPNPEP1) as endogenous controls.

    “Parallel assays for each sample were performed using TaqMan probes for β‐glucuronidase (GUS‐β) and X‐prolyl aminopepidase P1 (XPNPEP1) as endogenous controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Introduction

    RNA integrity number (RIN) values of the samples varied from 6.3 to 7.9.

    “The RIN values of the samples varied from 6.3 to 7.9.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Abstract

    These findings show alterations in the protein synthesis machinery in AD involving the nucleolus, nucleus and ribosomes in the hippocampus in AD some of them starting at first stages (I-II) preceding neuron loss.

    “These findings show alterations in the protein synthesis machinery in AD involving the nucleolus, nucleus and ribosomes in the hippocampus in AD some of them starting at first stages (I–II) preceding neuron loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    Cases with additional pathologies including Lewy body diseases, tauopathies, vascular diseases, TDP-43pathies, and metabolic syndrome were excluded.

    “Cases with additional pathologies, including Lewy body diseases, tauopathies (particularly argyrophilic grain disease), vascular diseases, TDP‐43pathies, and metabolic syndrome were excluded.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Tau binds to double- and single-stranded DNA in vitro.

    “Tau binds to double‐ and single‐strands of DNA in vitro 51, 61, 78”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [51] 51. Hua Q, He RQ, Haque N, Qu MH, del Carmen Alonso A, Grundke‐Iqbal I, Iqbal K (2003) Microtubule associated protein tau binds to double‐stranded but not single‐stranded DNA. Cell Mol Life Sci 60:413–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [61] 61. Krylova SM, Musheev M, Nutiu R, Li Y, Lee G, Krylov SN (2005) Tau protein binds single‐stranded DNA sequence specifically: the proof obtained in vitro with non‐equilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures FEBS Lett 579:1371–1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] 78. Padmaraju V, Indi SS, Rao JSJ (2010) New evidences on tau‐DNA interactions and relevance to neurodegeneration. Neurochem Int 57:51–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Histone deacetylase 6 interacts with the microtubule-associated protein tau.

    “Histone deacetylase 6 interacts with the microtubule‐associated protein tau 25.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] 25. Ding H, Dolan PJ, Johnson GV (2008) Histone deacetylase 6 interacts with the microtubule‐associated protein tau. J Neurochem 106:2119–2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction

    Seminal studies identified altered composition of ribosomes, abnormal expression levels of certain transcription factors, and impaired protein synthesis in cortical areas in cases with mild cognitive impairment and dementia caused by AD.

    “Seminal studies identified altered composition of ribosomes and abnormal expression levels of certain transcription factors, and impaired protein synthesis in cortical areas in cases with mild cognitive impairment and dementia caused by AD 26, 34, 62, 64, 84.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Ding Q, Markesbery WR, Chen Q, Li F, N. Keller JN (2005) Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 25:9171–9175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [34] 34. Ferrer I (2002) Differential expression of phosphorylated translation initiation factor 2 alpha in Alzheimer's disease and Creutzfeldt‐Jakob's disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 28:441–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [62] 62. Langstrom NS, Anderson JP, Lindroos HG, Winblad B, Wallace WC (1989) Alzheimer's disease‐associated reduction of polysomal mRNA translation. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 5:259–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [64] 64. Li X, An WL, Alafuzoff I, Soininen H, Winblad B, Pei JJ (2004) Phosphorylated eukaryotic translation factor 4E is elevated in Alzheimer brain. Neuroreport 15:2237–2240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] 84. Sajdel‐Sulkowska EM, Marotta CA (1984) Alzheimer's disease brain: alterations in RNA levels and in a ribonuclease‐inhibitor complex. Science 225:947–949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Both the proline-rich domain and the microtubule-binding domain of tau contribute to its interaction with DNA.

    “both the proline‐rich domain and the microtubule‐binding domain of tau are known to contribute to its interaction with DNA 107.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] 107. West MJ, Kawas CH, Stewart WF, Rudow GL, Troncoso JC (2004) Hippocampal neurons in pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 25:1205–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Introduction

    TaqMan PCR assays for each gene were performed in duplicate.

    “TaqMan PCR assays for each gene were performedin duplicate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Nuclear tau protects DNA from denaturation in vitro.

    “protects DNA from denaturation in vitro 51, 52”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [51] 51. Hua Q, He RQ, Haque N, Qu MH, del Carmen Alonso A, Grundke‐Iqbal I, Iqbal K (2003) Microtubule associated protein tau binds to double‐stranded but not single‐stranded DNA. Cell Mol Life Sci 60:413–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [52] 52. Hua Q, He R (2005) Tau could protect DNA double helix structure. Biochem Biophys Acta 1645:205–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction

    The main modifications in AD cortex include reduced rRNA levels, increased RNA oxidation, and reduced capacity of isolated polyribosomes to incorporate S35 methionine into protein.

    “The main modifications were reduced rRNA levels, increased RNA oxidation as shown by increased 8‐hydroxyguanosine immunoreactivity, and reduced capacity of isolated polyribosomes to incorporate S35 methionine into protein 26, 27, 48, 75, 76, 90, 91.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [26] 26. Ding Q, Markesbery WR, Chen Q, Li F, N. Keller JN (2005) Ribosome dysfunction is an early event in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 25:9171–9175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [27] 27. Ding Q, Markesbery WR, Cecarini V, Keller JN (2006) Decreased RNA, and increased RNA oxidation, in ribosomes from early Alzheimer's disease. Neurochem Res 31:705–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] 48. Honda K, Smith MA, Zhu X, Baus D, Merrick WC, Tartakoff AM et al (2005) Ribosomal RNA in Alzheimer disease is oxidized by bound redox‐active iron. J Biol Chem 280:20978–20986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [75] 75. Nunomura A, Chiba S, Lippa CF, Cras P, Kalaria RN, Takeda A et al (2004) Neuronal RNA oxidation is a prominent feature of familial Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis 17:108–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [76] 76. Nunomura A, Honda K, Takeda A, Hirai K, Zhu X, Smith MA, Perry G (2006) Oxidative damage to RNA in neurodegenerative diseases. J Biomed Biotechnol 2006:82323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [90] 90. Shan X, Lin CL (2006) Quantification of oxidized RNAs in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 27:657–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [91] 91. Shan X, Tashiro H, Lin CL (2003) The identification and characterization of oxidized RNAs in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 23:4913–4921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Protein tau is localized in the nucleus of neuroblastoma cells, non-neural cells, and neurons in human brain.

    “Protein tau is localized in the nucleus of neuroblastoma cells 44, 45, 66, 100, 105, non‐neural cells 21, 68, 101, and neurons in human brain 14.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [44] 44. Greenwood JA, Johnson GWW (1995) Localization and in situ phosphorylation state of nuclear tau. Exp Cell Res 220:332–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] 21. Cross DC, Muñoz JP, Hernández P, Maccioni RB (2000) Nuclear and cytoplasmic tau proteins from human non‐neuronal cells share common structural and functional features with brain tau. J Cell Biochem 78:305–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] 14. Brady RM, Zinkowski RP, Binder LI (1995) Presence of tau in isolated nuclei from human brain. Neurobiol Aging 16:479–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Nuclear tau confers stability to DNA.

    “confers stability to DNA 15, 92.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] 15. Brady RM, Zinkowski RP, Binder LI. Camero S, Benítez MJ, Barrantes A et al (2014) Tau protein provides DNA with thermodynamic and structural features which are similar to those found in histone‐DNA complex. J Alzheimers Dis 39:649–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [92] 92. Sjöberg MK, Shestakova E, Mansuroglu Z, Maccioni RB, Bonnefoy E (2006) Tau protein binds to peri‐centromeric DNA: a putative role for nuclear tau in nucleolar organization. J Cell Sci 119:2025–2034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Several studies have shown altered gene expression in the post-mortem brain of cases with Alzheimer's disease and related animal models.

    “Several studies have shown altered gene expression in the post‐mortem brain of cases with AD and related animal models 7, 67, 99.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [7] 7. Bossers K, Wirz KT, Meerhoff GF, Essing AH, van Dongen JW, Houba P et al (2010) Concerted changes in transcripts in the prefrontal cortex precede neuropathology in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 133:3699–3723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [67] 67. López‐González I, Schlüter A, Aso E, Garcia‐Esparcia P, Ansoleaga B, LLorens F et al (2015) Neuroinflammatory signals in Alzheimer disease and APP/PS1 transgenic mice: correlations with plaques, tangles, and oligomeric species. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 74:319–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [99] 99. Tan MG, Chua WT, Esiri MM, Smith AD, Vinters HV, Lai MK (2010) Genome wide profiling of altered gene expression in the neocortex of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Res 88:1157–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion

    This is the first study showing altered pathways related to protein synthesis, including altered mRNA and protein expression of certain nucleolar chaperones, factors linked to DNA polymerases, altered methylation and acetylation of specific histones, altered expression of nuclear tau, abnormal rRNA expression, altered expression of several RPL and RPS genes, and altered expression of certain initi

    “this is the first study showing altered pathways related to protein synthesis including altered mRNA and protein expression of certain nucleolar chaperones, factors linked to DNA polymerases, altered methylation and acetylation of specific histones, altered expression of nuclear tau, abnormal rRNA expression, altered expression of several RPL and RPS genes, and altered expression of certain initi”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Altered expression of components of the protein synthesis machinery reflects altered protein synthesis in Alzheimer's disease.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Progressive atrophy of the hippocampus, as visualized with several neuroimaging techniques and in a particular clinical context, is currently used as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease progression.

    “Progressive atrophy of the hippocampus, as visualized with several neuroimaging techniques and in a particular clinical context, is currently used as a biomarker of AD progression 8.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. Boutet C, Chupin M, Lehéricy S, Marrakchi‐Kacem L, Epelbaum S, Poupon C et al (2014) Detection of volume loss in hippocampal layers in Alzheimer's disease using 7 T MRI: a feasibility study. Neuroimage Clin 5:341–348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Morphological and immunohistochemical studies have shown reduced dendritic arbors, reduced numbers of synapses, and reduced synaptic protein markers both in the CA1 region of the hippocampus and in the DG.

    “morphological and immunohistochemical studies have shown reduced dendritic arbors, reduced numbers of synapses, and reduced synaptic protein markers both in the CA1 region of the hippocampus and in the DG 32, 36, 56, 82, 86, 87, 88, 89.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [32] 32. Einstein G, Buranosky R, Crain BJ (1994) Dendritic pathology of granule cells in Alzheimer's disease is unrelated to neuritic plaques. J Neurosci 14:5077–5088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [36] 36. Flood DG, Coleman PD (1986) Failed compensatory dendritic growth as a pathophysiological process in Alzheimer's disease. Can J Neurol Sci 13(Suppl. 4):475–479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] 56. Kaufmann WA, Barnas U, Humpel C, Nowakowski K, DeCol C, Gurka P et al (1998) Synaptic loss reflected by secretoneurin‐like immunoreactivity in the human hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Neurosci 10:1084–1094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    This change has been mainly interpreted as being the result of loss of afferents to the DG and to the loss of neurons in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

    “This change has been mainly interpreted as being the result of loss of afferents to the DG and to the loss of neurons in the CA1 region of the hippocampus 107.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] 107. West MJ, Kawas CH, Stewart WF, Rudow GL, Troncoso JC (2004) Hippocampal neurons in pre‐clinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 25:1205–1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reduced protein synthesis is one of the most plausible causes of neuron atrophy in AD.

    “However, the cause of neuron atrophy has not been examined in detail although one of the most plausible causes is reduced protein synthesis.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Modifications in the hippocampus with disease progression have not been assessed.

    “Modifications in the hippocampus with disease progression have not been assessed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lack of perfect match between mRNA levels and corresponding proteins can be explained by the concomitant activity of epigenetic factors as several types of non-coding RNAs.

    “Lack of perfect match between mRNA levels and corresponding proteins, as seen in relation with increased NPM1 and NPM3 mRNAs and decreased NPM1 and NPM3 protein levels in the CA1 region of the hippocampus at stages III–IV, is not rare in human neurodegenerative diseases and can be explained by the concomitant activity of epigenetic factors as several types of non‐coding RNAs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Altered expression of components of the protein synthesis machinery reflects altered protein synthesis in Alzheimer's disease.

    “Together these observations support altered protein synthesis with disease progression.”
    “It can be argued that none of these alterations proves that protein synthesis is impaired in AD.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study on post-mortem AD brains revealed translocation of intranuclear tau to the soma in diseased brains compared to controls, indicating that intranuclear tau may also play a role in its pathogenesis.

    “A recent study on post-mortem AD brains revealed translocation of intranuclear tau to the soma in diseased brains compared to controls [57], indicating that intranuclear tau may also play a role in its pathogenesis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract and results name different acetylated histones

    Major

    The abstract identifies the decreased acetylation marker as H3K12ac, whereas the results identify it as H4K12ac. These refer to different histones, so the paper is inconsistent about which marker decreased.

  • Western-blot antibody reference points to an mRNA table

    Minor

    The western-blot methods cite Table 3 for primary antibodies, but Table 3 is labeled as mRNA expression of ribosomal proteins, not antibody information.

  • Early CA1 result names RPS26 instead of RPS6

    Minor

    The results name RPS26 as down-regulated at stages I-II, but the final comments name RPS6 for the same early CA1 finding. Table 3 lists RPS6, not RPS26.

3 of 3

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 108 · Cited by 245

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stelzl U, 2001, Ribosomal proteins: role in ribosomal function, Encyclopedia Life Sci, 1

Authors
Hernández‐Ortega, K., Garcia‐Esparcia, P., Gil, L., Lucas, J. J., & Ferrer, I.
Affiliations
  • Bellvitge University Hospital (ES)
  • Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio (ES)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Institute of Neuropathology, Service of Pathologic Anatomy, IDIBELL‐Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat Spain
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-14
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
593-605
ISSN
  • 1015-6305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3639
OpenAlex
W1858579514
Cited by
245
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (278486)
  • DEVELAGE and the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Instituto de Salud Carlos III - Fondos FEDER, a way to build Europe FIS (PIE14/00034, PI14/00757)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, protein synthesis, ribosome, nucleolus, hippocampus, CA1, dentate gyrus, nucleolin, nucleophosmin, UBTF, histone modifications, H3K9me2, neurofibrillary tangles, 28S rRNA, ribosomal proteins, translation initiation factors, eIF2α, eIF3, eIF5, elongation factor 2, hippocampal atrophy, synaptic loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cell Count, Cell Nucleus, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurons, Nuclear Proteins, Ribosomal Proteins, Ribosomes, Case-Control Studies, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Pol1 Transcription Initiation Complex Proteins, Transcriptional Elongation Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review