Cited by 40Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPain Management and Opioid UseReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

BU 08073 a buprenorphine analogue with partial agonist activity at μ‐receptors in vitro but long‐lasting opioid antagonist activity in vivo in mice

Open access
Khroyan, T V, Wu, J, Polgar, W E, Cami‐Kobeci, G, Fotaki, N, Husbands, S M, Toll, L·2015·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Buprenorphine is a potent analgesic with high affinity at μ, δ and κ and moderate affinity at nociceptin opioid (NOP) receptors. Nevertheless, NOP receptor activation modulates the in vivo activity of buprenorphine. Structure activity studies were conducted to design buprenorphine analogues with high affinity at each of these receptors and to characterize them in in vitro and in vivo assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Compounds were tested for binding affinity and functional activity using [(35) S]GTPγS binding at each receptor and a whole-cell fluorescent assay at μ receptors. BU08073 was evaluated for antinociceptive agonist and antagonist activity and for its effects on anxiety in mice. KEY RESULTS: BU08073 bound with high affinity to all opioid receptors. It had virtually no efficacy at δ, κ and NOP receptors, whereas at μ receptors, BU08073 has similar efficacy as buprenorphine in both functional assays. Alone, BU08073 has anxiogenic activity and produces very little antinociception. However, BU08073 blocks morphine and U50,488-mediated antinociception. This blockade was not evident at 1 h post-treatment, but is present at 6 h and remains for up to 3-6 days. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These studies provide structural requirements for synthesis of 'universal' opioid ligands. BU08073 had high affinity for all the opioid receptors, with moderate efficacy at μ receptors and reduced efficacy at NOP receptors, a profile suggesting potential analgesic activity. However, in vivo, BU08073 had long-lasting antagonist activity, indicating that its pharmacokinetics determined both the time course of its effects and what receptor-mediated effects were observed. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bph.12796

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alexander SP, Mathie A, Peters JA (2011). Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol 164 Suppl 1: S1-324.
  2. Cox BM, Christie MJ, Devi L, Toll L, Traynor JR (2014). Challenges for Opioid Receptor Nomenclature. Br J Pharmacol. in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khroyan, T. V., Wu, J., Polgar, W. E., Cami‐Kobeci, G., Fotaki, N., Husbands, S. M., & Toll, L.
Affiliations
  • SRI International (US)
  • Torrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies (US)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Husbands, S M
  • Toll, L
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
668-680
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2171087382
Cited by
40
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA023281, DA20469)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
opioid receptor affinity, mu-opioid receptor, delta opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, antinociception, morphine antagonism, U50,488, anxiogenic activity, structure-activity relationship, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Buprenorphine, Cricetulus, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred ICR, Narcotic Antagonists, Pain, CHO Cells, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review