The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting the consequences of species loss using size‐structured biodiversity approaches
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the consequences of species loss in complex ecological communities is one of the great challenges in current biodiversity research. For a long time, this topic has been addressed by traditional biodiversity experiments. Most of these approaches treat species as trait‐free, taxonomic units characterizing communities only by species number without accounting for species traits. However, extinctions do not occur at random as there is a clear correlation between extinction risk and species traits. In this review, we assume that large species will be most threatened by extinction and use novel allometric and size‐spectrum concepts that include body mass as a primary species trait at the levels of populations and individuals, respectively, to re‐assess three classic debates on the relationships between biodiversity and (i) food‐web structural complexity, (ii) community dynamic stability, and (iii) ecosystem functioning. Contrasting current expectations, size‐structured approaches suggest that the loss of large species, that typically exploit most resource species, may lead to future food webs that are less interwoven and more structured by chains of interactions and compartments. The disruption of natural body‐mass distributions maintaining food‐web stability may trigger avalanches of secondary extinctions and strong trophic cascades with expected knock‐on effects on the functionality of the ecosystems. Therefore, we argue that it is crucial to take into account body size as a species trait when analysing the consequences of biodiversity loss for natural ecosystems. Applying size‐structured approaches provides an integrative ecological concept that enables a better understanding of each species' unique role across communities and the causes and consequences of biodiversity loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived?
Barnosky, A. D., Matzke, N., Tomiya, S., Wogan, G. O. U., Swartz, B., Quental, T. B., Marshall, C., McGuire, J. L., Lindsey, E. L., Maguire, K. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09678 · Cited by 4,400 · cited 1×
“The world’s ecosystems are currently exposed to species extinctions at a higher rate than ever before (Barnosky et al., 2011) leading to projected strong decreases in their biodiversity (Pereira et al.”
BackgroundEffects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Emmett Duffy, J., Wright, J. P., Downing, A. L., Sankaran, M., & Jouseau, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05202 · Cited by 1,871
Predicting extinction risk in declining species
Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G., & Mace, G. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · Cited by 1,768
Evolutionary Ecology of Parasites: Second Edition
Poulin, R. (2007) · doi:10.1515/9781400840809 · Cited by 1,671
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Body size in ecological networks
WOODWARD, G., EBENMAN, B., EMMERSON, M., MONTOYA, J., OLESEN, J., VALIDO, A., & WARREN, P. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,251
The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity
Duffy, J. E., Cardinale, B. J., France, K. E., McIntyre, P. B., Thébault, E., & Loreau, M. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x · Cited by 1,065
Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships
Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I., & Naeem, S. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-1245.1 · Cited by 890 · cited 1×
“While decreases in species richness are usually associated with lower ecosystem functions such as primary productivity, litter decomposition and nutrient recycling, these relationships are most often better explained by the diversity of species functional traits (Cadotte et al., 2009; Flynn et al., 2011), and they are…”
BackgroundEmerging horizons in biodiversity and ecosystem functioning research
Reiss, J., Bridle, J. R., Montoya, J. M., & Woodward, G. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.018 · Cited by 607
Pleistocene Megafaunal Collapse, Novel Plant Communities, and Enhanced Fire Regimes in North America
Gill, J. L., Williams, J. W., Jackson, S. T., Lininger, K. B., & Robinson, G. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179504 · Cited by 598
Cited by
The global decline of freshwater megafauna
He, F., Zarfl, C., Bremerich, V., David, J. N. W., Hogan, Z., Kalinkat, G., Tockner, K., & Jähnig, S. C. (2019) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14753 · Cited by 283
Self-citationFreshwater Megafauna: Flagships for Freshwater Biodiversity under Threat
Carrizo, S. F., Jähnig, S. C., Bremerich, V., Freyhof, J., Harrison, I., He, F., Langhans, S. D., Tockner, K., Zarfl, C., & Darwall, W. (2017) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/bix099 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Brose, U., Blanchard, J. L., Eklöf, A., Galiana, N., Hartvig, M., R. Hirt, M., Kalinkat, G., Nordström, M. C., O'Gorman, E. J., Rall, B. C., Schneider, F. D., Thébault, E., & Jacob, U.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-12
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 684-697
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2236673748
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the consequences of species loss using size‐structured biodiversity approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/brv.12250
- The paper
- Brose, U., Blanchard, J. L., Eklöf, A., Galiana, N., Hartvig, M., R. Hirt, M., Kalinkat, G., Nordström, M. C., O'Gorman, E. J., Rall, B. C., Schneider, F. D., Thébault, E., & Jacob, U. (2017). Predicting the consequences of species loss using size‐structured biodiversity approaches. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.